Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cprise

(8,445 posts)
4. Yes, Nuland is the source, though I mispoke re NED being 'the' instrument
Wed Apr 9, 2014, 05:41 AM
Apr 2014

According to Politifact (whose characterization of the crisis nevertheless adheres to corporate media norms) we spent nearly half a billion$ since 2009 alone on Ukrainian NGOs. And this funding has been going on since 1992.

U.S. Obscures Foreign Aid To Ukraine, But Here's Where Some Goes
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/07/us-foreign-aid-ukraine_n_4914682.html


(...)A significant portion of democracy program funding has come from the National Endowment for Democracy and its affiliated groups. The government-funded nonprofit discloses grant recipients on its website. (Publish What You Fund warned that this list may be incomplete and may not meet international foreign aid reporting standards the group promotes.)

From 2007 through 2012, the National Endowment for Democracy spent $16.8 million to stimulate civic activity and fund election watchdogs and non-state run reporting outlets in Ukraine. (NED will post 2013 grant recipients within the next week.) These funds have gone to organizations that played a role in the 2004 Orange Revolution and have since continued to monitor elections, investigate government corruption and educate youth about democratic government.

Ukrainian recipient organizations of U.S. democracy aid included election monitors Civic Network OPORA, an offshoot of the pro-Orange Revolution Pora Party (at least $411,370), and the Committee of Voters of Ukraine, which has branches across the country to monitor local elections, conduct polls and provide an organizing space for young Ukrainians ($788,072). The youth chapter of the nationalist People's Movement of Ukraine party, All-Ukrainian Youth Civic Organization or "Young Rukh," received nearly $200,000 to train youth activists and monitor corruption at Ukrainian universities. Other funding has gone to the Democratic Initiatives Foundation for election exit polling and surveys ($363,404).
(...)

Personally, I would not be surprised if that level of funding had most Ukrainians with activist or journalistic aspirations getting their bread buttered in some form by the US government.

A big problem here is that a group like NED, who are notorious for pushing a US imperial agenda, is included in the funding. This casts doubt over the character of the entire stream of purported good works.

Another big problem is how Nuland openly supported the rioters and their demands, which were stridently for the removal of Yanukovich. She did this in the first days of December in response to the riot police beating up some people.
Pretty easy after the USAID twitter thing in Cuba. /nt jakeXT Apr 2014 #1
I love all these ProSense Apr 2014 #5
National Endowment For Democracy is a US govt-funded front org cprise Apr 2014 #2
I Doubt You Can Back That Figure Up, Sir The Magistrate Apr 2014 #3
Yes, Nuland is the source, though I mispoke re NED being 'the' instrument cprise Apr 2014 #4
Yes, Sir, You Mis-Spoke, To A Degree Which Calls Into Question If You Understand The Basics Here The Magistrate Apr 2014 #10
He doth protest too much cprise Apr 2014 #17
I Describe, Sir, Not Protest The Magistrate Apr 2014 #18
Lets talk dates... cprise Apr 2014 #29
Riot Police Initiated Violence On 30 November, Sir The Magistrate Apr 2014 #41
You are full of it. Beatup protesters is not cause for Regime Change. cprise Apr 2014 #43
Wait ProSense Apr 2014 #44
'Unsubstantiated claims' - sure cprise Apr 2014 #47
No, ProSense Apr 2014 #48
Flat denial with no mitigating facts. cprise Apr 2014 #50
All you've done is repeat: Leave Russia alone. n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #52
I'm saying your intepretation is based on the Cold Warrior drumbeat. n/t cprise Apr 2014 #53
Nonsense. You're searching for justification for your Russian apologia. n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #54
Your draconian take on the finance law fell apart, then changed the subject. n/t cprise Apr 2014 #57
Look at this thread: You started out with a bogus defense of legalized persecution ProSense Apr 2014 #58
You didn't like that reminder about US-backed NGOs I see. n/t cprise Apr 2014 #59
This Is Nonesense, Sir The Magistrate Apr 2014 #60
Rioters initiated lethal violence-Dec. 2 cprise Apr 2014 #61
That, Sir, Was Priceless The Magistrate Apr 2014 #62
So condemning lethal force in response to beatings is 'support of police brutality'. cprise Apr 2014 #63
It Is Clear, Sir, You Have Never Given The Subject Much Thought The Magistrate Apr 2014 #64
So violence=violence, regardless of what kind. cprise Apr 2014 #65
Your Sputtering Is Noted, Sir The Magistrate Apr 2014 #66
What does that have to do with Russia and the HRW report? n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #6
HRW is arguing a Libertarian Globalist view of NGO finance. cprise Apr 2014 #8
Again, ProSense Apr 2014 #9
I don't deny the anti-gay mindset there cprise Apr 2014 #45
See, ProSense Apr 2014 #46
Get back to me on Saudi Arabia, India, UAE, etc. sometime. cprise Apr 2014 #49
So you ProSense Apr 2014 #51
The rhetoric has descended to baby babble now cprise Apr 2014 #55
Right... ProSense Apr 2014 #56
Yes, we need is a similar law in the U.S. ProSense Apr 2014 #7
Also pine for the bankers who would be "rounded up" if Glass-Steagal cprise Apr 2014 #11
The fact is that Russian law impede human rights. ProSense Apr 2014 #13
Falling back on stale rhetoric? cprise Apr 2014 #19
"No doubt Russian laws 'impede' human rights ProSense Apr 2014 #20
That one line tautology cprise Apr 2014 #23
Says the person ProSense Apr 2014 #24
You can imagine that and bet it is happening treestar Apr 2014 #15
Does the US allow foreign governments to foment unrest in malaise Apr 2014 #12
Well, ProSense Apr 2014 #14
Yes, but its still possible to finance advocates in Russia cprise Apr 2014 #21
Ridiculous. ProSense Apr 2014 #22
Disclosure isn't persecution. Too bad for your 3rd Way bankers. n/t cprise Apr 2014 #25
You know damn well this isn't about "disclosure." n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #26
Yeah, it means increased skepticism. Again... too bad! cprise Apr 2014 #27
No, it means legalized persecution. ProSense Apr 2014 #28
How enlightening. n/t cprise Apr 2014 #30
Yes. treestar Apr 2014 #16
An undefeated bully wanders into the woods nilesobek Apr 2014 #31
Isn't that ProSense Apr 2014 #32
Isn't Palin a neo-con that makes nilesobek Apr 2014 #33
"Isn't Palin a neo-con that makes crazy and inaccurate alarmist statements about Russia?" ProSense Apr 2014 #34
Just seems like mockery, but do carry on. nilesobek Apr 2014 #35
No, just correlating bravado and inaccuracies. n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #36
I'm ok with any kind of constructive criticism. nilesobek Apr 2014 #37
Well, that ProSense Apr 2014 #38
And the jury results are in... aikoaiko Apr 2014 #42
You spliced two stories together nilesobek Apr 2014 #39
That makes four ridiculous comments. n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Russia: Constitutional Co...»Reply #4