Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lostincalifornia

(3,639 posts)
3. Actually if he would have had regular colonoscopies every 5 years they might have been able to avoid
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 09:25 PM
Apr 2014

the surgery, and catch it when it was just a polyp.

Actually even with the ACA they are most likely not going to do screening for uterine cancer unless it is found during a pelvic examine, or symptoms of bleeding occur. I also do not believe they will normally screen for stomach cancer without symptoms either.

Right now the ACA covers mammograms and colonoscopies, and PSAs, but with some of the new recommendations, consumers when they reach a certain age, have symptoms or self-exam, really have to insist that they be screened



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Colon Cancer Screening Wa...»Reply #3