Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)

14. As I thought about it...

Reply to seabeckind (Reply #12)

Thu May 1, 2014, 09:35 AM

May 2014

an objective analysis of the actual requirements, ie, fighter, strike, and ground-attack aircraft, it's obvious to anyone (except the MBA who is a mile wide and an inch deep) that these functions are in total opposition.

And they can never be satisfied without compromising quality.

Which is why my phone barely does phone, shows lousy movies, takes mediocre pictures, and I have to fake it out to attach it to my PC.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why The Pentagon Is Spending So Unbelievably Much On The F-35 [View all] xchrom May 2014 OP

I'm guessing ... GeorgeGist May 2014 #1

Yes OLDMDDEM May 2014 #6

company held accountable? seabeckind May 2014 #15

Because it's all they've got to fend off the cheap unmanned drones. nt bemildred May 2014 #2

yeah there is that. nt xchrom May 2014 #3

I find the article lacking. Laelth May 2014 #4

Nah, it's 'cause some rich fuckers bought our government and are running it to get richer. Scuba May 2014 #5

Precisely. Laelth May 2014 #9

Funny, I don't feel safer. Scuba May 2014 #7

+1 xchrom May 2014 #8

Because they don't need a toll Booth? Ichingcarpenter May 2014 #10

... xchrom May 2014 #11

That's it? All it does? seabeckind May 2014 #12

As I thought about it... seabeckind May 2014 #14

"The tail fins scatter particles in the very high frequency electromagnetic spectrum" oldhippie May 2014 #13

The late-Victorian physicist Ichingcarpenter May 2014 #16

Thanks .... oldhippie May 2014 #17

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #18

The article doesn't discuss the cost issue tammywammy May 2014 #19

presumably it's to soak up anything that WOULD help americans--real healthcare (not "Medicaid plus MisterP May 2014 #20

We need this overpriced bit of tinware to protect us....from what? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #21

But but but...toll roads on freeways! Erp...burp...fart... Rex May 2014 #22

Somewhere in the next life Howard Hughes is having a chuckle... Blue_Tires May 2014 #23