Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
15. Well, Adam Smith felt that corporations were inevitably a bad way to do business:
Sat May 10, 2014, 11:22 AM
May 2014

The trade of a joint stock company is always managed by a court of directors. This court, indeed, is frequently subject, in many respects, to the control of a general court of proprietors. But the greater part of those proprietors seldom pretend to understand anything of the business of the company, and when the spirit of faction happens not to prevail among them, give themselves no trouble about it, but receive contentedly such half-yearly or yearly dividend as the directors think proper to make to them. This total exemption from trouble and from risk, beyond a limited sum, encourages many people to become adventurers in joint stock companies, who would, upon no account, hazard their fortunes in any private copartnery. Such companies, therefore, commonly draw to themselves much greater stocks than any private copartnery can boast of. The trading stock of the South Sea Company, at one time, amounted to upwards of thirty-three millions eight hundred thousand pounds. The divided capital of the Bank of England amounts, at present, to ten millions seven hundred and eighty thousand pounds. The directors of such companies, however, being the managers rather of other people's money than of their own, it cannot well be expected that they should watch over it with the same anxious vigilance with which the partners in a private copartnery frequently watch over their own. Like the stewards of a rich man, they are apt to consider attention to small matters as not for their master's honour, and very easily give themselves a dispensation from having it. Negligence and profusion, therefore, must always prevail, more or less, in the management of the affairs of such a company. It is upon this account that joint stock companies for foreign trade have seldom been able to maintain the competition against private adventurers. They have, accordingly, very seldom succeeded without an exclusive privilege, and frequently have not succeeded with one. Without an exclusive privilege they have commonly mismanaged the trade. With an exclusive privilege they have both mismanaged and confined it.

Book V, I, iii, 1 The Wealth of Nations

Emphases added.

If the basic speed is fine, what is the problem with an optional fast lane, paid for by the Fred Sanders May 2014 #1
Because the basic speed (bandwidth) will need to be increased over time to handle extra demand. Armstead May 2014 #2
You dont seem to have a clue. If the cable companies can decide who gets fast and who gets slow rhett o rick May 2014 #3
Slow lanes moondust May 2014 #7
It's a barrier to innovation - a new company has to pay extra to establish itself muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #11
My web hosting company says all the hysteria in that post is unfounded. Which makes me question ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #4
your web hosting company lol. what else would they say nt msongs May 2014 #5
I'm sure that Charles Manson also feels he's a victim of hysteria. mbperrin May 2014 #8
Well, we shall see. I'm told all that is happening is that the telcos are going to open the dark ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #9
And who is your ISP? Perhps they are sincere --or they're lying through their teeth Armstead May 2014 #10
^^^this KG May 2014 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #16
Providing information that I was given is "snide" and "condescending"? Your... ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #17
Disagreement is one thing -- you were not simply poviding information Armstead May 2014 #19
Hysteria and knee jerk hate of anything to do with corporations by some is getting boring. Fred Sanders May 2014 #12
Well, Adam Smith felt that corporations were inevitably a bad way to do business: mbperrin May 2014 #15
Don't worry, be happy Armstead May 2014 #20
Nobody in this thread has said it's a good thing nor has anyone shaken pom-poms over it. But ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #23
It's not hysterical to try to get you to consider the possibility that.... Armstead May 2014 #27
My web host is not as large as Host Gator or GoDaddy, but they do host hundreds of ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #28
Obviosly you dont choose to look into it any further, which is sad Armstead May 2014 #30
Oh, you misunderstand and you have it backwards. The reason we're talking about it is because ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #31
You're obviously free to challenge the DU status quo... Armstead May 2014 #32
Well said. mbperrin May 2014 #25
Not sure if I've replied to your threads...said most of my piece on this topic in response to ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #29
Okay, please allow me a little analysis. mbperrin May 2014 #13
So, if I am using a website to sell widgets, how does this effect me? Let's go a bit further... ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #18
THOSE are the exact details that we need. mbperrin May 2014 #24
For your average, content-medium webpage... Shandris May 2014 #26
Bandwidth is a finite resoruce unless there is investment in it Armstead May 2014 #33
I'f rather not wait until it is too late to find out Armstead May 2014 #21
I do remember the huge surplus of fibre optic that only a few years ago was said to be so Fred Sanders May 2014 #34
Yes, that's right, ladies and gentlemen, Unknown Beatle May 2014 #6
Without net neutrality, you will only see what rich people want you to see. Taitertots May 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Summer That Will Chan...»Reply #15