Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Your opinion on pornography. [View all]
I'm trying to gauge DU's opinion on pornography. So I've created a poll.
If you have anything to add or would like to comment on the options, I'm open to suggestions.
Definitions:
Protected speech is speech that is covered by first amendment.
49 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Pornography is protected speech and is not harmful to society as a whole. | |
44 (90%) |
|
Pornography is protected speech, but it is harmful to society as a whole. | |
3 (6%) |
|
Pornography is not protected speech, but it is not harmful to society as a whole. | |
0 (0%) |
|
Pornography is not protected speech and harmful to society as a whole. | |
2 (4%) |
|
i liek 2 vote | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Protected speech means you're not allowed to discriminated based on legal content.
Kurska
May 2014
#3
Aye, there's the rub: Vagueness. Would even a workable definition of "crush"
Eleanors38
May 2014
#11
Because we cling to legal technicalities as a means of expressing or repressing...
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#17
I prefer to speak of the prevalence of different types of acts and themes in pornography...
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#16
Yes, because the desire for porn is more important than the people harmed by it.
seaglass
May 2014
#20
in another thread there is a DUer that says they could take a lot of objectification for 10K ...
Tuesday Afternoon
May 2014
#21
I have never been poor and probably because of that money is not the be all end all to me.
seaglass
May 2014
#22
it was male poster that said that they would put up with a lot of objectification for 10k
Tuesday Afternoon
May 2014
#23
would you like to help support her legal defense? or do you think she made enough money off this
Tuesday Afternoon
May 2014
#25
if she took out charges I imagine she would ... don't you? of course -
Tuesday Afternoon
May 2014
#28
Actually no, if she wanted to stop she is legally allowed to demand it to stop at any point.
Kurska
May 2014
#43
What do you mean? I think she is clear that she finished the job so that would mean she went along
seaglass
May 2014
#44
Yep, we differ. I don't intentionally associate with people who get pleasure out of degrading and
seaglass
May 2014
#45
Apparently the fact that it is consensual adults and that both parties are into it is irrelevant.
Kurska
May 2014
#47
Yep, I admit I am prejudiced towards violent sadistic people. I find it disturbing that you aren't
seaglass
May 2014
#49
I don't think I'll take you up on your suggestion. If you don't want to hear it, don't bring up the
seaglass
May 2014
#53
You offered dismissive and derogatory opinions on people's private sexual lives.
Kurska
May 2014
#54
Your words aren't having the effect you were hoping for unless it was to encourage me to
seaglass
May 2014
#55
You're not getting this at all. I'm not apologizing to anyone who enjoys how Miriam Weeks
seaglass
May 2014
#60
Definitely protected speech, probably not harmful but I don't think we have the data to be sure. N.T
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2014
#29