General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This... May 26, 2014 [View all]Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Sure, the US messed up in Indochina. I'm not denying that.
You quote Eisenhower as admitting that an 80% majority of Vietnamese favored Ho Chi Minh (which I have serious doubts about), yet the Eisenhower administration itself "used (SEATO) as its justification for refusing to go forward with the 1956 elections intended to reunify Vietnam". (http://history.state.gov/milestones/1953-1960/seato) Do you really think that "Uncle Ho" was interested in free and fair elections? Do you really think that South Vietnam was better off once the North Vietnamese took over?
I don't want to sound like a John Bircher, but I have known people from both China and South Vietnam who were around both before and after the Communists took over in their respective countries, and they all said the Communist systems sucked. How many millions of people died in the Greal Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution? How many untold thousands of South Vietnamese were forcibly sent away to camps after the fall of Saigon? Uncle Ho would have had purges in the South, regardless of whether or not there had been US involvement.