General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The real reason a very loud few are posting hostility toward Glenn Greenwald at DU: [View all]X_Digger
(18,585 posts)REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Seriously? This is a host? Constantly hurling insults and obsessing on DU'ers does not reflect well.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jun 3, 2014, 12:26 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Neither disruptive, nor hurtful, not even rude...
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Regardless of whether this comment was made by a Host, it is a valid query about a practice that seems to be a problem on DU. I have wondered much the same of some members when I see alerts for comments which appear to have been made for the purpose of foisting discipline upon a member against whom the alerter seems to have an agenda rather than a simple opposing point of view. Someone needed to say it and here it is.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Regardless of where we've disagreed in the past, the poster's current comment is quite reasonable and acceptable.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Stupid alert. Here's to hoping for a 7-0 shutout.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No comment to the Alerter. Do Not Hide.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
I was juror #5. High-five for 24 hour revocation of alerting privileges.