Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The issue is "The Family"...not "religion". [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)88. Yeah, you are right, we all imagined this too
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
195 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
EW is not going to run against Hillary.....stop dreaming.....she is friends with HRC!
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#41
she is far and away the front runner who can kick the assof any Repblican polled
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#50
yeah i support the primary winner.....and she sure looks like a winner to me
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#54
If she does, I would lose respect for her too. It would mean she has sold out.
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#49
Based on her history, she will always resist calls to repudiate, apologize, or admit error.
Ken Burch
Jun 2014
#5
Warren also needs to address her Republican past. Sorry. Were you around during Reagan?
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2014
#28
Fine-ALL potential candidates should be vetted-and all should be anti-homophobia.
Ken Burch
Jun 2014
#46
Yes, she left the Party and became a Democrat. She repudiates their economic policies
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#51
I tell the truth you call it sniping. But i dont blame you......I would lash out to if i was about
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#63
Your posts here sound way too arrogant and demanding. That tone won't help HRC.
Ken Burch
Jun 2014
#81
Have I defended Hillary's pandering? No. And I'd love to hear someone ask her
KittyWampus
Jun 2014
#45
I appreciate that that is where you are at - but I don't think you speak for everybody.
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#13
You fail to understand that those of us targeted by the Family are aware of her association with
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2014
#22
You should try being honest when you represent my position, rather than distorting it.
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#26
What is your position? That post was you typing about what you think OTHERS think.
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2014
#31
I didn't speak for anybody who wasn't mean - I spoke to my impressions of the site as a whole
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#34
“Attended a prayer group that’s associated with The Family” and “member of the Family” are different
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#37
As I wrote above, she attended a prayer group that was associated with The Family. And all the
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#76
So once again, no evidence she's a member of The Family? If the charge is that she wrote glowing
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#78
You think I won't believe something that's true about her (she's a member of the DLC) because I
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#92
Sure; if you ever find evidence of her being a member of The Family, feel free to post it. N/T
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#97
"Whether or not the accusations are true isn't important because the person did other things I don't
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#100
I never disputed her words; I asked for evidence of her membership. And since you are now ignoring
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#103
Fair enough; if you ever manage to find evidence that she is/was a member of The Family, feel free
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#109
"You want another president who cavorts with EVIL?" No, but all of them have for the past 60 years
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#144
Yes. It was 4 pages long and didn't provide any evidence that she's a member of The Family. Next
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#91
Candidates who profess any philosophy or faith need to answer very specific questions
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2014
#33
You want to criticize Hillary for involvement in "the family" because you associate it
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#36
Right. Because in this country, if you're running for office it's a huge advantage to be an atheist.
Arugula Latte
Jun 2014
#90
you're delusional if you believe an ultra-right wing cabal embraced Hillary Clinton as an associate
bigtree
Jun 2014
#70
the quote isn't evidence of anything except that she likes the man's religiosity
bigtree
Jun 2014
#125
that's even worse for whatever you're selling here. She described meeting Coe in 1993?
bigtree
Jun 2014
#131
Again, she did attend for fifteen years, more than just a prayer breakfast,
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2014
#137
I ask you for proof she 'attended' anything for 15 years and I get yet another song and dance
bigtree
Jun 2014
#145
I told you to your face what I believe what you are due to your behavior
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2014
#178
And Democrats should not associate themselves with this fascist cult, ever, in any way. nt
Zorra
Jun 2014
#133
"the issue" is hatred of the female Democratic front runner and the ability to smear her like
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#151
Easy peasy....she has the support of the majority of Democrats AND she beats the pants off any
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#159
We've had a LOT of people who were "frontrunners" two years BEFORE the primaries.
Ken Burch
Jun 2014
#188
People who think that "winning for winning's sake" are enthusiastic about her.
Ken Burch
Jun 2014
#186