Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The issue is "The Family"...not "religion". [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)161. Please proceed
continue with this game. Continue to dig.
Oh and it matters little what you are supplied. It really mattes not
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
195 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
EW is not going to run against Hillary.....stop dreaming.....she is friends with HRC!
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#41
she is far and away the front runner who can kick the assof any Repblican polled
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#50
yeah i support the primary winner.....and she sure looks like a winner to me
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#54
If she does, I would lose respect for her too. It would mean she has sold out.
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#49
Based on her history, she will always resist calls to repudiate, apologize, or admit error.
Ken Burch
Jun 2014
#5
Warren also needs to address her Republican past. Sorry. Were you around during Reagan?
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2014
#28
Fine-ALL potential candidates should be vetted-and all should be anti-homophobia.
Ken Burch
Jun 2014
#46
Yes, she left the Party and became a Democrat. She repudiates their economic policies
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#51
I tell the truth you call it sniping. But i dont blame you......I would lash out to if i was about
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#63
Your posts here sound way too arrogant and demanding. That tone won't help HRC.
Ken Burch
Jun 2014
#81
Have I defended Hillary's pandering? No. And I'd love to hear someone ask her
KittyWampus
Jun 2014
#45
I appreciate that that is where you are at - but I don't think you speak for everybody.
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#13
You fail to understand that those of us targeted by the Family are aware of her association with
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2014
#22
You should try being honest when you represent my position, rather than distorting it.
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#26
What is your position? That post was you typing about what you think OTHERS think.
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2014
#31
I didn't speak for anybody who wasn't mean - I spoke to my impressions of the site as a whole
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#34
“Attended a prayer group that’s associated with The Family” and “member of the Family” are different
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#37
As I wrote above, she attended a prayer group that was associated with The Family. And all the
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#76
So once again, no evidence she's a member of The Family? If the charge is that she wrote glowing
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#78
You think I won't believe something that's true about her (she's a member of the DLC) because I
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#92
Sure; if you ever find evidence of her being a member of The Family, feel free to post it. N/T
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#97
"Whether or not the accusations are true isn't important because the person did other things I don't
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#100
I never disputed her words; I asked for evidence of her membership. And since you are now ignoring
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#103
Fair enough; if you ever manage to find evidence that she is/was a member of The Family, feel free
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#109
"You want another president who cavorts with EVIL?" No, but all of them have for the past 60 years
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#144
Yes. It was 4 pages long and didn't provide any evidence that she's a member of The Family. Next
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#91
Candidates who profess any philosophy or faith need to answer very specific questions
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2014
#33
You want to criticize Hillary for involvement in "the family" because you associate it
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#36
Right. Because in this country, if you're running for office it's a huge advantage to be an atheist.
Arugula Latte
Jun 2014
#90
you're delusional if you believe an ultra-right wing cabal embraced Hillary Clinton as an associate
bigtree
Jun 2014
#70
the quote isn't evidence of anything except that she likes the man's religiosity
bigtree
Jun 2014
#125
that's even worse for whatever you're selling here. She described meeting Coe in 1993?
bigtree
Jun 2014
#131
Again, she did attend for fifteen years, more than just a prayer breakfast,
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2014
#137
I ask you for proof she 'attended' anything for 15 years and I get yet another song and dance
bigtree
Jun 2014
#145
I told you to your face what I believe what you are due to your behavior
nadinbrzezinski
Jun 2014
#178
And Democrats should not associate themselves with this fascist cult, ever, in any way. nt
Zorra
Jun 2014
#133
"the issue" is hatred of the female Democratic front runner and the ability to smear her like
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#151
Easy peasy....she has the support of the majority of Democrats AND she beats the pants off any
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#159
We've had a LOT of people who were "frontrunners" two years BEFORE the primaries.
Ken Burch
Jun 2014
#188
People who think that "winning for winning's sake" are enthusiastic about her.
Ken Burch
Jun 2014
#186