Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)

11. I figured that's because

Reply to PoliticAverse (Reply #10)

Mon Jun 30, 2014, 06:58 PM

Jun 2014

we already had the First Amendment that applied to the states, and the RFRA holds the Federal government to a much stricter standard. Today was really the first test of what that meant.

In any case, RFRA is not going to be amended, and it's clearly not going to be struck down by the SCOTUS.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

There is a very simple solution to the Hobby Lobby case [View all] dsc Jun 2014 OP

So how do we defeat the Gerrymander? Anansi1171 Jun 2014 #1

a variety of things dsc Jun 2014 #2

Don't let "gerrymander" become an excuse to do nothing. GOTV. If we all show up FSogol Jun 2014 #4

Indeed!!!-nt Anansi1171 Jun 2014 #5

Dr Deans 50 state strategy, plus Keynes-ian Liberals. Volaris Jun 2014 #8

I think that's a point a lot of folks are missing. Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #3

Yes, the Court based their decision The Religious Freedom Restoration Act PoliticAverse Jun 2014 #6

Not in a good way. lol. BootinUp Jun 2014 #7

Good luck with that customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #9

Yeah the Supreme Court in an earlier case found that the RFRA couldn't constitutionally be applied PoliticAverse Jun 2014 #10

I figured that's because customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #11

It's easier than that MFrohike Jun 2014 #12

Repeal it. We have the First Amendment. That is enough. alarimer Jun 2014 #13