General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ginsburg: 'Radical' Hobby Lobby Ruling May Create 'Havoc' [View all]octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Any decision to use contraceptives made by a woman covered under Hobby Lobbys or Conestogas plan will not be propelled by the Government, it will be the womans autonomous choice, informed by the physician she consults.
Religious organizations exist to foster the interests of persons subscribing to the same religious faith. Not so of for-profit corporations.
The distinction between a community made up of believers in the same religion and one embracing persons of diverse beliefs, clear as it is, constantly escapes the Courts attention. One can only wonder why the Court shuts this key difference from sight.
Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be perceived as favoring one religion over another, the very risk the [Constitution's] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude.
http://www.salon.com/2014/06/30/here_are_the_highlights_of_justice_ginsburgs_fiery_hobby_lobby_dissent/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=socialflow