Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: why I suspect reaction to Hobby Lobby is somewhat hair-on-fire [View all]randys1
(16,286 posts)86. So they are trying to destroy ACA and separation with one swoop
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
204 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're accusing ME of being one of the "word police"? That is laughter inducing.
Quantess
Jul 2014
#32
Because sometimes a little word like "meh" sums up my opinion of a post quite succinctly
quinnox
Jul 2014
#52
Fine. If you you don't care that you appear wimpy and passive aggressive, then neither do I.
Quantess
Jul 2014
#56
Little fool? Really? Given the post and the edit, I might delete "little" and replace it
merrily
Jul 2014
#140
"Overweening" is the type of word that might be involved in a Seinfield episode.
Quantess
Jul 2014
#192
Oh, I think that was intentional on the part of the conservative bloc of SCOTUS.
Chan790
Jul 2014
#50
Well, speaking for myself, I'm going along with the outrage because I'm outraged.
kickitup
Jul 2014
#62
"Going along with the outrage." You're kidding, right? Here's why you suspect the reaction
Squinch
Jul 2014
#72
Why would you post a non-sequitor like that unless you meant it in a passive-agressive way?
Quantess
Jul 2014
#64
I'm starting to get lost here LOL, I responded directly to a post saying "showing your true colors"
snooper2
Jul 2014
#66
Interestingly, it is males who are doing the "there, there, calm down" bit.
Arugula Latte
Jul 2014
#44
Of course it is, and just because they post here doesnt mean they are at ALL liberal
randys1
Jul 2014
#79
I am still upset about the Shelby County decision that gutted the Voting Rights Act
Gothmog
Jul 2014
#201
Do you really have no idea what the potential implications of this ruling are?
etherealtruth
Jul 2014
#67
So in effect, we have a male telling women affected by the decision to calm down.
LanternWaste
Jul 2014
#74
So you wrote this OP just for the guys? You just keep digging deeper here, don't you?
Squinch
Jul 2014
#77
Yup. I love when they are all like, "Well, I *was* on your side, but if you're going to be a bitch
PeaceNikki
Jul 2014
#151
Oh, yes! Their feminist convictions are so deeply held that if someone is mean to them on a message
Squinch
Jul 2014
#152
Exactly, as I have said, these 5 justice, 4 for certain, are bought and paid for
randys1
Jul 2014
#91
That's cool -- you might feel differently when your employer can get between you and your doctor.
Brickbat
Jul 2014
#97
And again, you dig deeper. Women who have had their rights hijacked, because they don't see this
Squinch
Jul 2014
#155
The Citizens United decision is 100x more repulsive than the Hobby Lobby one.
Calista241
Jul 2014
#116
Exactly. Yeah. That does tend to set my hair on fire, whether Enrique thinks that is
Squinch
Jul 2014
#147
And you are wrong. A corporation was given religious status, and that is seriously
6000eliot
Jul 2014
#170
He never stated of being unable understand why people were angry, but even acknowledged it
nolabels
Jul 2014
#204