Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: JUST. STOP. IT. [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)38. Again, how do you define socialism?
If you don't care about definitions, how is anyone, including you, supposed to know what you are talking about?
Dictionary definitions are for the RW now? LMAO. (Yet you also claim not to care about labels.)
Using words to mean whatever you feel like having them mean is RW, not dictionary definitions.
Sorry, I cannot continue an alleged discussion based upon terms you can't define, nor one that labels dictionary definitions RW. Nor one in which you first claim socialism, then, when asked for a definition of socialism, switch over to "social democracy." But, mostly calling dictionary definitions RW.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep. This is why no one who is pro-choice should use the term "pro-life" or let
merrily
Jul 2014
#23
I call such people "anti-choice", "pro-forced-birth", and "big-government types".
riqster
Jul 2014
#26
Agreed but I never saiid the US owned any means of production like pure 100% socialism/communism
ErikJ
Jul 2014
#35
I use standard definitions, not stuff I make up to fit the post I'm making at the moment.
merrily
Jul 2014
#40
Some of these "Patriots" are CONVINCED they are in the majority in wanting to execute Liberals.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2014
#22
Kicked and recommended! Just the kind of insight I would expect from Fugelsang.
Enthusiast
Jul 2014
#24