Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 07:53 AM Aug 2014

NYT: Where Are the National Democrats on Ferguson? [View all]

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/23/upshot/where-are-the-national-democrats-on-ferguson.html

There is something very strange about the national political reaction to the protests in Ferguson, Mo., (and nationally) over Michael Brown’s shooting. The protesters are angry, and they’re not aimlessly angry. They have a specific set of policy grievances about policing and criminal justice that are shared by a large slice of the electorate, particularly the Democratic primary electorate. Yet no national Democratic politician, nobody of the sort who is likely to mount a presidential run anytime soon, has risen to give voice to the anger we’re seeing in Ferguson. Nobody seems eager to make police abuses or racial injustice a key issue in a national campaign, even though an awful lot of Democratic voters could be activated on those issues.

Why not? African-Americans are a hugely important Democratic Party constituency. Gallup data suggests 22 percent of self-identified Democrats are black. Exit polls showed black voters made up one-third of North Carolina primary voters in 2008 and a majority in South Carolina. If there were an incident of similar salience to a group that made up such a large share of the Republican base, you can bet a number of Republican politicians would be lining up to associate themselves with the protesters.

...

Democrats also haven’t had to fear that not taking up this issue will cost them black votes. “Up until the last few months, there really hasn’t been any serious competition for the black vote on a policy level,” said Jeff Smith, a white Democrat who represented a racially mixed St. Louis district in the Missouri State Senate from 2006 to 2009. Even with Senator Rand Paul taking up the issues of over-incarceration and the drug war, Republicans remain too far from the median black voter on a swath of issues from economics to voter ID to make a serious general election play.

So there is a good general election logic for Democrats to give short shrift to the issues raised in Ferguson. But if the Tea Party has taught us anything, it’s that a base can force its party to take stances that won’t be popular in a general election. Black voters, and other Democratic voters who care about issues of policing and racial justice, don’t have to flex their political muscle by being willing to leave the party. If these issues are of importance to much of the electorate — and this month’s protests suggest they are — then a politician should be able to build a credible Democratic primary campaign by focusing on them.
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawmakers make laws to control people. As long as they feel they are in control everything is good Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2014 #1
Why would they yeoman6987 Aug 2014 #2
The smart ones are waiting for the facts seveneyes Aug 2014 #3
What facts might surface that would change anything? Scuba Aug 2014 #5
Who knows Puzzledtraveller Aug 2014 #13
+1 Couldn't agree more! B Calm Aug 2014 #20
are there facts about the paramilitary police forces that are in dispute? frylock Aug 2014 #22
A disgraceful performance, with O'Malley probably the only one coming off well alcibiades_mystery Aug 2014 #4
I read pretty widely and eclectically and I would like to note that the Socialist and VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #23
+1 yes other political parties have spoken out in uniform with the their message lunasun Aug 2014 #27
Probably best not to step in and say much now while everything is still under investigation? Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2014 #6
It seems Missouri is a Dem stronghold Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #7
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Aug 2014 #8
I don't pretend to know without looking Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #12
Nervous? alcibiades_mystery Aug 2014 #15
Throttle back a little Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #16
The St. Louis county prosecutor Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #14
The thread on Hillary not saying enough has links treestar Aug 2014 #9
In order of impact (based on that thread) wyldwolf Aug 2014 #18
So Democrats need to emulate Republicans who use any bad situation KittyWampus Aug 2014 #10
Investigations go on forever. former9thward Aug 2014 #11
Great piece by Josh Barro Stellar Aug 2014 #17
Of course they're quiet fredamae Aug 2014 #19
now watch the Libertarians take the ball and run on this issue.. frylock Aug 2014 #21
Marinating in their own cowardice, apparently. hifiguy Aug 2014 #24
1. Running for President; 2. Averse to pissing of the one(s) running for President. WilliamPitt Aug 2014 #25
Don't really care? malthaussen Aug 2014 #26
They're not democrats (as we remember) whatchamacallit Aug 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT: Where Are the Natio...