Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)NYT: Where Are the National Democrats on Ferguson? [View all]
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/23/upshot/where-are-the-national-democrats-on-ferguson.htmlThere is something very strange about the national political reaction to the protests in Ferguson, Mo., (and nationally) over Michael Browns shooting. The protesters are angry, and theyre not aimlessly angry. They have a specific set of policy grievances about policing and criminal justice that are shared by a large slice of the electorate, particularly the Democratic primary electorate. Yet no national Democratic politician, nobody of the sort who is likely to mount a presidential run anytime soon, has risen to give voice to the anger were seeing in Ferguson. Nobody seems eager to make police abuses or racial injustice a key issue in a national campaign, even though an awful lot of Democratic voters could be activated on those issues.
Why not? African-Americans are a hugely important Democratic Party constituency. Gallup data suggests 22 percent of self-identified Democrats are black. Exit polls showed black voters made up one-third of North Carolina primary voters in 2008 and a majority in South Carolina. If there were an incident of similar salience to a group that made up such a large share of the Republican base, you can bet a number of Republican politicians would be lining up to associate themselves with the protesters.
...
Democrats also havent had to fear that not taking up this issue will cost them black votes. Up until the last few months, there really hasnt been any serious competition for the black vote on a policy level, said Jeff Smith, a white Democrat who represented a racially mixed St. Louis district in the Missouri State Senate from 2006 to 2009. Even with Senator Rand Paul taking up the issues of over-incarceration and the drug war, Republicans remain too far from the median black voter on a swath of issues from economics to voter ID to make a serious general election play.
So there is a good general election logic for Democrats to give short shrift to the issues raised in Ferguson. But if the Tea Party has taught us anything, its that a base can force its party to take stances that wont be popular in a general election. Black voters, and other Democratic voters who care about issues of policing and racial justice, dont have to flex their political muscle by being willing to leave the party. If these issues are of importance to much of the electorate and this months protests suggest they are then a politician should be able to build a credible Democratic primary campaign by focusing on them.
Why not? African-Americans are a hugely important Democratic Party constituency. Gallup data suggests 22 percent of self-identified Democrats are black. Exit polls showed black voters made up one-third of North Carolina primary voters in 2008 and a majority in South Carolina. If there were an incident of similar salience to a group that made up such a large share of the Republican base, you can bet a number of Republican politicians would be lining up to associate themselves with the protesters.
...
Democrats also havent had to fear that not taking up this issue will cost them black votes. Up until the last few months, there really hasnt been any serious competition for the black vote on a policy level, said Jeff Smith, a white Democrat who represented a racially mixed St. Louis district in the Missouri State Senate from 2006 to 2009. Even with Senator Rand Paul taking up the issues of over-incarceration and the drug war, Republicans remain too far from the median black voter on a swath of issues from economics to voter ID to make a serious general election play.
So there is a good general election logic for Democrats to give short shrift to the issues raised in Ferguson. But if the Tea Party has taught us anything, its that a base can force its party to take stances that wont be popular in a general election. Black voters, and other Democratic voters who care about issues of policing and racial justice, dont have to flex their political muscle by being willing to leave the party. If these issues are of importance to much of the electorate and this months protests suggest they are then a politician should be able to build a credible Democratic primary campaign by focusing on them.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
28 replies, 1671 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawmakers make laws to control people. As long as they feel they are in control everything is good
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2014
#1
A disgraceful performance, with O'Malley probably the only one coming off well
alcibiades_mystery
Aug 2014
#4
I read pretty widely and eclectically and I would like to note that the Socialist and
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#23
+1 yes other political parties have spoken out in uniform with the their message
lunasun
Aug 2014
#27
Probably best not to step in and say much now while everything is still under investigation?
Proud Liberal Dem
Aug 2014
#6
1. Running for President; 2. Averse to pissing of the one(s) running for President.
WilliamPitt
Aug 2014
#25