General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let me be crystal clear here with with regard to "Liberals" [View all]Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Every reality based Democrat (the only ones that are not most likely rat fornicators) knows that the left is the problem, solutions can only be found on the right or the center. Pragmatism tells us, that liberal only means you have the right to choose if you are a woman, the right to marry your same sex partner if you are born gay, and the right to free and equal civil liberties (well some of the time and only on some things), therefore nearly all Democratic politicians are extremely liberal.
As for non social policies, grow up and join the adults before you get spanked like the whinny fringe leftists you are, I have provided a list so even you damn dirty hippy most likely libertarians that are not very smart can understand what it means to be a responsible pragmatic Democrat, first tear that naked picture of Nader off your bedroom wall, then, memorize the following:
Democratic financial policies can only validly be proposed from the Friedman Chicago school of economics (fuck those fringe moonbat Keynesian most likely libertarian paulbots)
Democratic trade policies can only validly be proposed if they are enthusiastically free trade with an eye towards protecting the rights of the poor disadvantaged multinational corporations (fuck those fringe fair trade labor loving isolationist moonbat most likely libertarian paulbots)
Democratic banking/investment policies can only validly be proposed if you embrace the concept of providing liquidity to banks that are excellent gamblers that simply have a bit of bad luck every few years in predictable cycles when they bet your farms on mathematical equations and pieces of paper, but never ever give back the property they confiscate in the process, they should get to keep that as well, they work hard and we should not begrudge them what they steal fair and square. Another very important point, to thrive they must be free range and unregulated, because that is the only way for them to eventually trickle down on you what you deserve. (fuck those Commie most likely libertarian big government rule loving crazies that want to regulate and fine them for all the hard work they do to earn their trillions. We will no longer tolerate your most likely paulbot rat fornicating of our betters)
Democratic foreign policies can only be validly proposed if they are adequately interventionist with an eye towards making it easier to sell and produce arms (the only jobs program that ever works) or to procure whatever resources the multinational corporations covet on or under the ground those terrorist foreigners are squatting on, they may live there, but they do not own the resources, ownership is only fairly determined by an appropriate bidding war between the corporations that God gave those resources to when he created Adam Inc. and Eve LLC. (fuck the bleeding heart liberal most likely libertarian paulbot isolationists that do not understand foreign policy)
Democratic Constitutional policies can only be validly proposed if they allow or disallow whatever rights the Government wants to that you think some Goddamn old piece of hemp paper grants you when you are high on some other strains of hemp (fuck those traitor loving, Putin fellating free speech and privacy fetishist most likely paulbots twice sideways)
I hope all you leftist most likely libertarian Commie rat fornicators are taking notes, because this is the only way you will ever be part of the Democratic party. I don't know why I bother because although there are zillions of you lefties disrupting here and failing to vote and thus throwing elections, you are a very small minority of fringe crazies that are statistically negligible and your input therefore is hardly meaningful.
Sorry TWM, you are as always correct, but you are too nice sometimes to these pitiable leftist dirty hippy freaks, so I had to step in.