Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
34. Thanks - I'd been planning to investigate but hadn't got round to it yet; so thanks for the info!
Mon Sep 1, 2014, 07:25 AM
Sep 2014

I am gobsmacked that this paper ever got through peer review; there are so many holes in it.

Yes, there is some correlation between visual reaction time and IQ but it is far from a perfect one, and anyway, as the authors should know, correlation does not equal causation! Reaction time is commonly used in cognitive psychology as an indication of which tasks are easier than others: if you find a task easy you will generally do it more quickly. As people with high IQs generally find many tasks easier than those with lower IQs, they are likely on the whole to show faster reaction times. But that doesn't mean that reaction time is the basis for IQ, or that slower visual reaction time will necessarily indicate lower IQ. For example, while people with severe visual impairments are likely to be identified and excluded from such studies, people with more subtle visual difficulties (a significant proportion of the population) may take part and show slower reaction times.

As for Richard Lynn, he is a racist who brings his biases into his research, and really brings psychology into disrepute. I remember that 'IQ and the Wealth of Nations' paper; it is an awful example of how NOT to do science.

'The Mail is repackaging white nationalist bollocks, via a dumb US student.'

Yes, that describes it. The Mail loves ANYTHING that will demonstrate that everything's got worse since the days of Good Queen Victoria, and especially if it can put a racist slant on it.

So Idiocracy will one day be seen as a documentary madville Aug 2014 #1
LOL- my thoughts exactly :) Marrah_G Aug 2014 #3
At this point in time damnedifIknow Aug 2014 #9
One day? hobbit709 Sep 2014 #36
more or less coincide with the advent of processed food drray23 Aug 2014 #2
Yep, coincides with that and about a billion other changes over those years. HERVEPA Aug 2014 #8
here is one from the british medical journal drray23 Aug 2014 #10
Thanks for the citation. (and there was no maybe in your original post) HERVEPA Aug 2014 #11
for starts - shouldn't that be westerners rather than westerns? hollysmom Aug 2014 #4
Devolution? 3rdwaydem Aug 2014 #5
I assume it's Daily Fail science articles and bad graphs making everybody stupid. nt LeftyMom Aug 2014 #6
HA! Don't you find it so hypocritical a tabloid complaining about lower IQ's? nt alp227 Sep 2014 #13
I'm sure it would do wonders for their circulation! nt LeftyMom Sep 2014 #14
Fabulous. Cleita Aug 2014 #7
The angle of decline appears steeper until 2010................. wandy Sep 2014 #12
What about regression towards the mean??? Manifestor_of_Light Sep 2014 #15
I thought IQ wasn't hereditary. Marr Sep 2014 #16
Do you believe that intelligence is hereditary in dogs? Quantess Sep 2014 #24
I'm not sure. Marr Sep 2014 #39
So our suspicions are proven correct. Live and Learn Sep 2014 #17
I think people will opt for designer applegrove Sep 2014 #18
The illustrated head in the chart appears to be breathing through its mouth. betsuni Sep 2014 #19
Maybe we only have so much collective intelligence and ... LisaLynne Sep 2014 #20
I blame AMAR0113 Sep 2014 #21
My theory is daredtowork Sep 2014 #22
Just shy of 92 is... 3catwoman3 Sep 2014 #23
In America, we've had SPECIAL help Vine Gatherer Sep 2014 #25
+1 newfie11 Sep 2014 #26
'ow, my balls'. indeed. i collect old books. not just jane austin. pansypoo53219 Sep 2014 #27
Firstly, this is the Daily Mail. Reading it would reduce anyone's IQ LeftishBrit Sep 2014 #28
LOL. Very good point... Violet_Crumble Sep 2014 #29
The test was actually on visual reaction times; they claimed a correlation with IQ muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #31
Thanks - I'd been planning to investigate but hadn't got round to it yet; so thanks for the info! LeftishBrit Sep 2014 #34
There is other evidence of the decline in IQ. KurtNYC Sep 2014 #33
None of these provide very convincing evidence LeftishBrit Sep 2014 #41
I'd love to see a parallel graph with the rise of malaise Sep 2014 #30
It's not a graph, but this seals the argument for me... Violet_Crumble Sep 2014 #32
Love it malaise Sep 2014 #35
Is it because we're hiring more cops? rock Sep 2014 #37
Brawndo's got what plants crave! Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #38
Television Eye Octafish Sep 2014 #40
One of the reasons I tend to agree with this article damnedifIknow Sep 2014 #42
The Powell Memorandum spelled it out. GOP started buying media Big Time... Octafish Sep 2014 #43
Evolution has no direction. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #44
Lead, heavy metals, pesticides, toxic environment, less child mortality JCMach1 Sep 2014 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are we becoming more STUP...»Reply #34