Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CTyankee

(63,926 posts)
32. Yes, I was politically active in that ERA fight back in the late 70s. I was working in D.C. at
Sat Apr 14, 2012, 04:14 PM
Apr 2012

the legislative office of the ACLU at the time. You have described one of the two main reasons ERA was defeated, e.g., that it wasn't needed because gains had been made by using the 14th amendment. The response to that was that the 14th amendment does not always prove to have such utility. It was tried unsuccessfully by suffragists as a means of getting the vote for women, and the arduous amendment process had to be undertaken instead. (BTW, the other major argument against the ERA at that time was the issue of women in combat. People freaked out thinking about their daughters fighting in the jungles of Vietnam).

I think it is worth discussing why our constitution is viewed as inflexible by the emerging democracies. Here is the NYT article: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/us/we-the-people-loses-appeal-with-people-around-the-world.html which you may have read. It is an intriguing article.

I'd like to hear what you have to say about it!

I couldn't agree more The Blue Flower Apr 2012 #1
...... ingac70 Apr 2012 #2
The ERA Would Not Even Get Through Congress Today AndyTiedye Apr 2012 #3
That's the point.... (nt) jeff47 Apr 2012 #5
politically it would seem like a winner Johonny Apr 2012 #4
Done bradberger29 Apr 2012 #6
rec. KG Apr 2012 #7
What would be the practical effect of passage? Jim Lane Apr 2012 #8
Scott Walker signed the repeal of the Wisconsin Equal Pay enforcement act just last week. dflprincess Apr 2012 #10
I disagree, on two counts Jim Lane Apr 2012 #11
How About... It's The Correct Thing To Do... AND... It's Fucking About Time... WillyT Apr 2012 #20
No, I would NOT leave women out of the Constitution Jim Lane Apr 2012 #26
sorry to say, this is a typical American response: GIVE UP. CTyankee Apr 2012 #18
You're mischaracterizing my position Jim Lane Apr 2012 #25
After experiencing the ERA defeat in the late 70s, I must say that I became pretty cynical. CTyankee Apr 2012 #30
The defeat of the ERA wasn't as complete as it might have been Jim Lane Apr 2012 #31
Yes, I was politically active in that ERA fight back in the late 70s. I was working in D.C. at CTyankee Apr 2012 #32
Thanks for the interesting article Jim Lane Apr 2012 #33
Scalia's argument is monumentally stupid, IMO. To argue, in effect, that you somehow have CTyankee Apr 2012 #35
Kick !!! WillyT Apr 2012 #9
Yes. HooptieWagon Apr 2012 #12
3 more states... loyalsister Apr 2012 #13
Wouldn't We Have To Start All Over Again ??? WillyT Apr 2012 #14
Maybe not. There is a movement afoot to start where we left off...with 3 more states to go! CTyankee Apr 2012 #19
Not necessarily loyalsister Apr 2012 #21
Thank You For That !!! WillyT Apr 2012 #22
Difficulties with the three-state strategy Jim Lane Apr 2012 #27
Another great idea from WillyT. Zorra Apr 2012 #15
:) WillyT Apr 2012 #16
And Another Thing... The Current Democrats Are Too Stupid/Afraid To See This As An Advantage... WillyT Apr 2012 #17
Not bad. I like. slampoet Apr 2012 #23
Not yet. Wait until the repubicans are trying to patch things up with women, then spring it on them JVS Apr 2012 #24
I asked myself this same thing just the other day. Ship of Fools Apr 2012 #28
It would never make it through. HappyMe Apr 2012 #29
Why yes it is the perfect time! k&r Little Star Apr 2012 #34
I am actually predicting that this will happen soon. BlueIris Apr 2012 #36
Done! loyalsister Apr 2012 #37
Thank You For That !!! WillyT Apr 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question For The Class: W...»Reply #32