Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 01:33 PM Nov 2014

Here is the remarkable reporting by Lawrence O'Donnell on the 2016 election [View all]

Last edited Wed Nov 19, 2014, 12:49 AM - Edit history (1)

He quotes a conservative commentator from Texas who laments there is no chance for a Republican Presidential candidate to win in 2016. O'Donnell also said the Republicans will not be able to hold the Senate for longer than two years. In 2016, Democrats will be defending one (count 'em again -- one) Senate seat, and Republicans must hold on to 22. O'Donnell said the odds of the latter happening are zero.

Here are four paragraphs from the column he references, but I hope you will find the time to read the entire piece. At one point, O'Donnell said no matter who the Republicans run , they lose. Better still, it doesn't matter who the Democrats run, they win. Thinking about all of the discussions we have had here about our alternative choices, this might be the one Presidential race we can run who we want. Think about that. And the reason is because of the Blue Wall, described in the article. Remember that phrase when you get depressed over the events of these days.

https://www.facebook.com/ingrahamangle/posts/718848661545486
CONSERVATIVE MIND THOUGHTS CHRIS LADD
GOPlifer

Which way is right? With Chris Ladd
The missing story of the 2014 election

Few things are as dangerous to a long term strategy as a short-term victory. Republicans this week scored the kind of win that sets one up for spectacular, catastrophic failure and no one is talking about it.

What emerges from the numbers is the continuation of a trend that has been in place for almost two decades. Once again, Republicans are disappearing from the competitive landscape at the national level across the most heavily populated sections of the country while intensifying their hold on a declining electoral bloc of aging, white, rural voters. The 2014 election not only continued that doomed pattern, it doubled down on it. As a result, it became apparent from the numbers last week that no Republican candidate has a credible shot at the White House in 2016, and the chance of the GOP holding the Senate for longer than two years is precisely zero.

For Republicans looking for ways that the party can once again take the lead in building a nationally relevant governing agenda, the 2014 election is a prelude to a disaster. Understanding this trend begins with a stark graphic.

Behold the Blue Wall:
The Blue Wall is block of states that no Republican Presidential candidate can realistically hope to win. Tuesday that block finally extended to New Hampshire, meaning that at the outset of any Presidential campaign, a minimally effective Democratic candidate can expect to win 257 electoral votes without even trying. That’s 257 out of the 270 needed to win.

(emphasis added.)


We have great hope for our political future. Between now and 2016, we need to focus on minimizing the damage the Republicans will do, and we must brainstorm about who we would like to run. If you believe the logic of this article, and I do, we should focus on choosing the candidate who will best serve the public interests and not that of the wealthy -- the one percenters, and the corporations.

Sam



98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The GOP will use the next two years trying to get rid of the the electoral college, or djean111 Nov 2014 #1
I do think they will try but I do not think they will succeed Samantha Nov 2014 #4
They are actively trying to do it in Wisconsin and Michigan LondonReign2 Nov 2014 #11
Yes, I know Samantha Nov 2014 #37
Hard to do their dirty tricks in states they don't control. Tommy2Tone Nov 2014 #79
In Pennsylvania.... CANDO Nov 2014 #89
More voter supression.... Historic NY Nov 2014 #12
ACORN used to do things like that NewJeffCT Nov 2014 #18
I think the Post Office should be allowed to register people to vote Samantha Nov 2014 #41
Registration is a state function,city,village,school district,water district, not a federal function CK_John Nov 2014 #46
This is the ground game.... Historic NY Nov 2014 #62
In rural areas the post office is usually real close to the court house anyway. LiberalArkie Nov 2014 #97
There is no question in my mind that the Electoral College is the only thing saving Republicans Sheepshank Nov 2014 #42
The key is toddwv Nov 2014 #96
Please, I feel like it's 2007 again and people are saying Bush will declare himself Calista241 Nov 2014 #90
I would say the blue wall is more like 242 EVs bluestateguy Nov 2014 #2
He said he thinks we can count Virginia now as behind the Blue Wall Samantha Nov 2014 #5
RE GOP 2014 Victories liberal from boston Nov 2014 #10
The GOP has lost New Mexico for good LordGlenconner Nov 2014 #27
I believe I read in that article he moved New Hampshire behind the blue wall Samantha Nov 2014 #38
I found Ladd very clear and trying to change things by warning people. As for O'Donnell, I found him Mass Nov 2014 #3
Just remember it is not O'Donnell's analysis Samantha Nov 2014 #7
I agree. Two things made this past election hurt more than it normally would... Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #30
I would love to see a Sanders/Warren ticket Samantha Nov 2014 #39
Voter turnout over all was davidpdx Nov 2014 #86
Yep. Agreed! :) Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #98
While we're remembering things... FBaggins Nov 2014 #84
The only chance the GOP has is electoral college gerrymandering. MohRokTah Nov 2014 #6
Can they redraw those districts before the next census? That is in 2020 Samantha Nov 2014 #8
Historically, redistricting only occurs after the census MohRokTah Nov 2014 #9
I thought the Supreme Court struck down the Texas gerrymandering law. Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #33
I think they did redo it and the SC struck it down Samantha Nov 2014 #44
That was the Gerrymander they did in 2010. MohRokTah Nov 2014 #55
How would their chances improve dramatically if none of the states they do this in are blue states Samantha Nov 2014 #43
Moving it to one elector per House district, + two electors to the candidate with the most votes. MohRokTah Nov 2014 #50
I went back and re-listened to the video Samantha Nov 2014 #73
They don't have to do anything with the districts SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #16
But they will still have the same number, right Samantha Nov 2014 #45
Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Florida are definite 2016 blue states. MohRokTah Nov 2014 #51
He did not have Florida behind the Blue Wall -- at least not on Lawrence's map Samantha Nov 2014 #59
How are they definitively blue states... FBaggins Nov 2014 #85
GOP Control came about from midterm elections MohRokTah Nov 2014 #88
Is this a new definition of "solidly blue"? FBaggins Nov 2014 #93
The number of electoral votes would be the same SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #52
Gerrymandering only takes place every 10 years. They can't do anything until 2020. Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #31
You really don't get the electoral college. MohRokTah Nov 2014 #53
They can change allocation of electoral votes at any time SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #54
All Based on the Assumption allinthegame Nov 2014 #13
I agree. You can't win a damn thing if voters don't vote ffr Nov 2014 #17
I would love to get rid of them(Rs)... freebrew Nov 2014 #28
Not to mention, the M$M NEVER bothered to correct the record on Benghazi or IRS Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #35
They also do not mention while these Keystone votes are being taken Samantha Nov 2014 #47
That's because the cowards in the Democratic Party ran away from a successful record AND Liberal_Stalwart71 Nov 2014 #34
Yes, it did -- and with regard to MSNBC, it is the Comcast influence Samantha Nov 2014 #48
Corporate (conservative) Democrats davidpdx Nov 2014 #87
Damn I hope he is right! hueymahl Nov 2014 #14
So do I Samantha Nov 2014 #49
God, I so hope this comes to fruition! Hulk Nov 2014 #15
BUT, there would have to be enough Democrats willing to do what needs to be done. Maineman Nov 2014 #25
Hillary Clinton will have a lot of company if she runs Hari Seldon Nov 2014 #19
how dems can get supermajorities in both houses, and president- cut samson's hair certainot Nov 2014 #20
I read your post 3 times and I think you have some good ideas Samantha Nov 2014 #69
ah bullshit Cosmocat Nov 2014 #21
You have a huge dose of pessimism there Samantha Nov 2014 #56
A couple of things Cosmocat Nov 2014 #91
---Better still, it doesn't matter who the Democrats run, they win.--- LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #22
O'Donnell said each Republican potential candidate has faded Samantha Nov 2014 #76
Warren or Sanders? It is time. alfredo Nov 2014 #23
No...no..a thousand times, NO!!!! SpankMe Nov 2014 #24
I am not trying to do that -- Ladd (a Republican) just stated the obvious Samantha Nov 2014 #58
The Electoral College need this modification. rickford66 Nov 2014 #26
In theory I agree, but historically Republicans have shown a pattern of pinpointing where the Samantha Nov 2014 #57
The main reason for my idea is rickford66 Nov 2014 #78
GOP will do a ton of irreparable damage in two years so they can secure the Country so glinda Nov 2014 #29
They're already trying to split up the electoral votes in some states IronLionZion Nov 2014 #32
But here is the point - they can't do that in the true blue states Samantha Nov 2014 #60
R#41 & K for, sounds GREAT!1 & this is via Horrible Human(?) Laura INGRAHAM?!1 n/t UTUSN Nov 2014 #36
That may be true....and it does make sense, but..... AverageJoe90 Nov 2014 #40
That is why we need a candidate voters salivate over (as we did with candidate Barack Obama) Samantha Nov 2014 #61
One possible strategy is to scream bloody murder about popular vote Generic Other Nov 2014 #63
I hope we could stop them from doing this but I am not sure we can Samantha Nov 2014 #64
Misses the point of the Republican victories. Orsino Nov 2014 #65
I do not assume President Obama will sign legislation with poison pills embedded Samantha Nov 2014 #70
I assume that the next farm bill will be highly toxic, for example. Orsino Nov 2014 #94
YEP Cosmocat Nov 2014 #92
Bush and Abbott did well in TX with hispanics. I think he is too optimistic about them voting Dem. freshwest Nov 2014 #66
Here it is: THE BLUE WALL MAP (screen shot from video) Samantha Nov 2014 #67
There are 10 Democratic Senate seats up in 2016, not one n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #68
I went back and re-listened to the video Samantha Nov 2014 #72
I see two that could be competetive: bornskeptic Nov 2014 #83
Is there anything Obama can do by executive order to ensure people have the right to vote? Voice for Peace Nov 2014 #71
I think the only thing he can do is refer problems to the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ Samantha Nov 2014 #75
Possible. But not certain. Savannahmann Nov 2014 #74
What can I say -- Rand Paul has changed with the times Samantha Nov 2014 #77
I would agree. Savannahmann Nov 2014 #80
He also knows they will show their ignorant asses and we will hate them all the more. lonestarnot Nov 2014 #81
Michigan GOP is trying to game the 2016 election. longship Nov 2014 #82
Republicans have 2 years to Gerrymander the presidential election LynneSin Nov 2014 #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here is the remarkable re...