Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Puts the 1% right where we want them, doesn't it? Demeter Dec 2014 #1
we're all supposed to look a the SHINY numbers, TalkingDog Skittles Dec 2014 #2
I thought it was a squirrel? Cryptoad Dec 2014 #15
disturbing Ramses Dec 2014 #3
That is because . . . Brigid Dec 2014 #5
indeed, true Ramses Dec 2014 #6
Besides, this country is AWESOME! maddiemom Dec 2014 #53
heh.. yuiyoshida Dec 2014 #55
It's not ignored at all. It's cultivated to help the wealthy stay healthy. For now. n/t jtuck004 Dec 2014 #50
a dishonest headline hfojvt Dec 2014 #4
Thank you. There's a big difference between sometime poor and chronic poor. nolabear Dec 2014 #7
The same tactic is used for hunger stats too. 7962 Dec 2014 #22
The romneys were never poor. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #24
"near poor" hfojvt Dec 2014 #33
They were never near poor either. Mitt's dad was Chairman of American Motors, Gov. of NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #45
I think you found the "blind spot" in their article. Major Hogwash Dec 2014 #26
Maybe... there are an awful lot of people 2 paychecks away from homeless... SomethingFishy Dec 2014 #51
and yet hfojvt Dec 2014 #52
Well I'm supporting 6 people, including 3 children SomethingFishy Dec 2014 #54
Your nineteenth-century ancestors . . . Brigid Dec 2014 #59
Hugs to you, honey! closeupready Dec 2014 #77
living was an analogy hfojvt Dec 2014 #78
If you are earning $13,000 per year and living on your own, not with some family JDPriestly Dec 2014 #58
sure the numbers add up hfojvt Dec 2014 #73
People should put money away. But you would not make it very far on what you have. JDPriestly Dec 2014 #76
I don't worry about what ifs hfojvt Dec 2014 #80
But then it isn't as sexy for the outrage addicts. Throd Dec 2014 #57
There would be no poor to speak of project_bluebook Dec 2014 #60
It's because they are lazy! Dustlawyer Dec 2014 #8
Just click on "smilies." Brigid Dec 2014 #10
if you need to know how to do it manually, it's like this. Ken Burch Dec 2014 #14
They are all politically ineffective, too. nt daredtowork Dec 2014 #9
I guess littlemissmartypants Dec 2014 #11
As Shelley once noted, poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #16
That sort of shines a spotlight on the "American Dream." NaturalHigh Dec 2014 #12
Yet our party refuses to mention the poor and poverty- Ken Burch Dec 2014 #13
"Our Party" ??? StevePaulson Dec 2014 #18
To be fair to the Democrats unrepentant progress Dec 2014 #37
"Our party" and the fascists both represent the interests of the bourgeoisie, who KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #20
Your point is well made... blackspade Dec 2014 #32
Well, the way I learned it, the bourgeoisie do not have to sell their KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #41
bourgeois exploiter.... blackspade Dec 2014 #44
Actually, bourgeois probably comes from the word "burg" which means town in German. JDPriestly Dec 2014 #61
With all due respect and thanks for your efforts, I'm not sure the need for a KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #63
If you read the article from which I quoted, the middle class, the bourgeosie was made up of JDPriestly Dec 2014 #64
Don't get me wrong. As a historical artifact, the bourgeoisie was a highly liberating element KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #65
Some definitions... vive la commune Dec 2014 #69
Just about all our problems can be,,, Cryptoad Dec 2014 #17
"The comfort of the rich relies on an abundance of the poor." Voltaire Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #19
"Behind every great fortune lies a great crime." Balzac KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #21
“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #23
"All private property is theft." Proudhon. I'm going to stick with the French, who got there KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #25
OK. "Après moi, le déluge" Louis XVI Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #28
LOL. Enchante. A bientot - nt KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #29
I can say from the experience of the last few years, "near poverty" is very different from poverty bhikkhu Dec 2014 #27
I grew up vacillating between poor and near poor and your post definitely rang KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #30
I had a similair experience growing up. blackspade Dec 2014 #34
I think some of my residual anger issues derive from late childhood and KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #36
I hear ya. blackspade Dec 2014 #42
I'm the same way... vive la commune Dec 2014 #70
Definitely harder on the kids bhikkhu Dec 2014 #39
+1000 blackspade Dec 2014 #43
Don't blame yourself for what capitalism has caused and continues to cause. As for KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #47
+++ thousands to your title line bread_and_roses Dec 2014 #48
Your post evoked memories I'd thought I left far behind Android3.14 Dec 2014 #49
Totally agree. I could have written yr post myself. truedelphi Dec 2014 #62
Revolution billhicks76 Dec 2014 #31
Wiat a minute. Gary 50 Dec 2014 #35
An ever deepening rift in everyday reality. From those who live in the real world. raouldukelives Dec 2014 #38
with help from our lovely democratic and republican politicians, mission accomplished nt msongs Dec 2014 #40
And the Koch Bros. are nearing the $100 billion mark. Initech Dec 2014 #46
And people on here finger wag at poor people for not having a diverse portfolio Skeeter Barnes Dec 2014 #56
Again with this? KentuckyWoman Dec 2014 #66
I shudder to think what these numbers were pre-Obama, six years ago. maced666 Dec 2014 #67
We must fight each other for the scraps UglyGreed Dec 2014 #68
But don't worry.... sendero Dec 2014 #71
Where are the guillotines? Odin2005 Dec 2014 #72
We can do better under Hillary. I am sure we can make 95% under her Katashi_itto Dec 2014 #74
If we use her definition of "broke", I guess we'll all be millionaires! MrMickeysMom Dec 2014 #75
so when will this get to be common knowledge outside the US? greymattermom Dec 2014 #79
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In the U.S. 49.7 Million ...»Reply #9