General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If HRC is nominated WITHOUT a primary challenge: [View all]still_one
(92,618 posts)actually much more anti-Hillary posters than anti-Warren or anti_Sanders.
Of course we are all entitled to our opinion, but DU is only representative of DU.
As far as your assertion that having Hillary would be worse than losing, I guess the Supreme Court means nothing to you.
You do realize that Bill Clinton's appointments were pretty good.
In fact what helped bring the Democratic party to the state it is in today is when labor decided to vote for reagan:
"The Reagan Democrats were Democrats before the Reagan years, and afterwards, but who voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984 (and for George H. W. Bush in 1988), producing their landslide victories. They were mostly white, socially conservative blue-collar workers, who lived in the Northeast, and were attracted to Reagan's social conservatism on issues such as abortion, and to his hawkish foreign policy."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_coalition
I guess we all know how well that turned out for them when Reagan took office. Labor has been suffering ever since.