Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
69. It has everything to do with Hillary and Bill being millionaires.
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 07:30 PM
Feb 2015

Friends of Bill and Hillary are billionaires.

Evidence of an American Plutocracy: The Larry Summers Story

Trickle Down, now in its 34th year...

"You can't help those who simply will not be helped. One problem that we've had, even in the best of times, is people who are sleeping on the grates, the homeless who are homeless, you might say, by choice." -- President Reagan, 1/31/84, on Good Morning America, defending his administration against charges of callousness.



You want more Trickle-Down Voodoo Reaganomics?

Then Friend Larry Summers.



Evidence of an American Plutocracy: The Larry Summers Story

By Matthew Skomarovsky
LilSis.org
Jan 10, 2011 at 19:31 EST

EXCERPT...

Another new business model Rubin and Summers made possible was Enron. Rubin had known Enron well through Goldman Sachs’s financing of the company, and recused himself from matters relating to Enron in his first year on the Clinton team. He and Summers went on to craft policies at Treasury that were essential to Enron’s lucrative energy trading business, and they were in touch with Enron executives and lobbyists all the while. Enron meanwhile won $2.4 billion in foreign development deals from Clinton’s Export-Import Bank, then run by Kenneth Brody, a former protege of Rubin’s at Goldman Sachs.

Soon after Rubin joined Citigroup, its investment banking division picked up Enron as a client, and Citigroup went on to become Enron’s largest creditor, loaning almost $1 billion to the company. As revelations of massive accounting fraud and market manipulation emerged over the next years and threatened to bring down the energy company, Rubin and Summers intervened. While Enron’s rigged electricity prices in California were causing unprecedented blackouts, Summers urged Governor Gray Davis to avoid criticizing Enron and recommended further deregulatory measures. Rubin was an official advisor to Gov. Davis on energy market issues at the time, while Citigroup was heavily invested in Enron’s fraudulent California business, and he too likely put pressure on the Governor to lay off Enron. Rubin also pulled strings at Bush’s Treasury Department in late 2001, calling a former employee to see if Treasury could ask the major rating agencies not to downgrade Enron, and Rubin also lobbied the rating agencies directly. (In all likelihood he made similar attempts in behalf of Citigroup during the recent financial crisis.) Their efforts ultimately failed, Enron went bust, thousands of jobs and pensions were destroyed, and its top executives went to jail. It’s hard to believe, but there was some white-collar justice back then.

SNIP...

Summers also starting showing up around the Hamilton Project, which Rubin had just founded with hedge fund manager Roger Altman. Altman was another Clinton official who had come from Wall Street, following billionaire Peter Peterson from Lehman Brothers to Blackstone Group, and he left Washington to found a major hedge fund in 1996. The Hamilton Project is housed in the Brookings Institution, a prestigious corporate-funded policy discussion center that serves as a sort of staging ground for Democratic elites in transition between government, academic, and business positions. The Hamilton Project would go on to host, more specifically, past and future Democratic Party officials friendly to the financial industry, and to produce a stream of similarly minded policy papers. Then-Senator Obama was the featured political speaker at Hamilton’s inaugural event in April 2006.

Summers joined major banking and political elites on Hamilton’s Advisory Council and appeared at many Hamilton events. During a discussion of the financial crisis in 2008, Summers was asked about his role in repealing Glass-Stegall, the law that forbade commercial and investment banking mergers like Citigroup. “I think it was the right thing to do,” he responded, noting that the repeal of Glass-Stegall made possible a wave of similar mergers during the recent financial crisis, such as Bank of America’s takeover of Merrill Lynch. He was arguing, in effect, that financial deregulation did not cause the financial crisis, it actually solved it. “We need a regulatory system as modern as the markets,” said Summers — quoting Rubin, who was in the room. “We need a hen house as modern as the food chain,” said the fox.

CONTINUED...

http://blog.littlesis.org/2011/01/10/evidence-of-an-ame... /



These are the richest times in history, with seven-eighths of all wealth ever, per David Stockman, Ronald Reagan's own Budget Director. Until we see economic fairness restored through fiscal and other government policies, laws and regulations; the rich will keep getting richer, the middle class will continue dissolving into the new poor, and the poor will become the super-majority. Of course, as money pays for lobbyists who write the laws and speech and cash are the same thing when it comes to elections, the majority perspective on policy will be silent as the grave.

Can you imagine that, stevenleser?
It's all legal like. Octafish Feb 2015 #1
One hand washes the other. n/t benz380 Feb 2015 #2
Well, you've gotten the cliches down pat, it seems. MineralMan Feb 2015 #22
Familiarity Breeds Corruption Octafish Feb 2015 #28
Yeah, and how many degrees of separation can you claim from anyone engaged in wrongdoing? stevenleser Feb 2015 #55
Seeing how repeal of Glass-Steagall cost America untold trillions... Octafish Feb 2015 #56
I see you evaded the question. Tells us all we need to know. nt stevenleser Feb 2015 #57
Who's ''us?'' And how many degrees of separation are needed to gain or lose one's integrity? Octafish Feb 2015 #59
Again, you evade the question. How many degrees of separation? nt stevenleser Feb 2015 #60
Who cares? It has nothing to do with the issue. Octafish Feb 2015 #62
It has everything to do with the issue, because tagging Hillary with this is stupid stevenleser Feb 2015 #66
It has everything to do with Hillary and Bill being millionaires. Octafish Feb 2015 #69
No, it doesn't, any more than the conduct of your third cousin twice removed stevenleser Feb 2015 #71
You know people by the people they hang out with. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #116
Great info. Thanks for the link. nt RiverLover Feb 2015 #78
Thank you. woo me with science Feb 2015 #80
you just keep on trying to sell that steve; maybe you'll find a buyer one day ND-Dem Feb 2015 #90
Not stupid at all. Bill and Hillary Clington tagged themselves with this. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #115
Oh. If you're asking me how many degrees of separation from me to the banksters, a lot. Octafish Feb 2015 #63
No, how much distance is there between you and anyone doing any wrongdoing stevenleser Feb 2015 #65
Like I wrote, none in my family. Octafish Feb 2015 #67
No one in your extended family has ever committed ANY kind of crime? stevenleser Feb 2015 #68
Why is that so hard for you to believe? Octafish Feb 2015 #70
Look up the concept of six degrees of separation. It will explain everything. Nt stevenleser Feb 2015 #72
He's mad because his point went absolutely nowhere. Rex Feb 2015 #83
The guy is relentlessly obtuse. Octafish Feb 2015 #85
Not surprising that self-appointed reporters think everyone is corrupt. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #118
nor mine. do you know a lot of criminals yourself, then? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #91
In my family, you have to look very, very far to find any kind of crime. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #117
the best form of separation DonCoquixote Feb 2015 #74
Lloyd Blankfein: "I held fundraisers for her." (HRC) antigop Feb 2015 #82
GOP/WallST atty:fine w/ Jeb or Hillary;Warren our worst nightmare. Divernan Feb 2015 #96
Wall Street Republicans' dark secret: Hillary Clinton 2016 RiverLover Feb 2015 #101
Probably quite a few when it comes to greed. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #114
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!!!! Romulox Feb 2015 #104
My all time fave since we are on the subject Caretha Feb 2015 #119
+1 It's a cozy, elite club, woo me with science Feb 2015 #30
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree. A whole family of grifters. Divernan Feb 2015 #50
Excellent post. nt woo me with science Feb 2015 #75
+100. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #92
Thank you for the heads-up, Divernan. Octafish Feb 2015 #102
And people wonder why some of us do not want Hillary to run. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #34
Some ideas are as old as dirt. Octafish Feb 2015 #61
^^^^^^^^^^^^ woo me with science Feb 2015 #79
NO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO MOONLIGHT FOR PRIVATE COMPANIES. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #89
Combine that with the swells going from NSA to private practice and back... Octafish Feb 2015 #103
And this: JDPriestly Feb 2015 #113
I heard his cousin was also best friends in elementary school with Chelsea's neighbor's uncle alcibiades_mystery Feb 2015 #3
Laugh at these links too then. benz380 Feb 2015 #5
These connections between bankers and politicians have been well documented for quite some time btrflykng9 Feb 2015 #32
Chelsea Clinton's Husband Suffers Massive Hedge Fund Loss On Greek Investment Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #4
And one of his major investors just happens to be Lloyd Blankfein. hedda_foil Feb 2015 #24
they are part of the players in game therory Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #25
Like father, like son ... GeorgeGist Feb 2015 #46
Absolutely. I spelled it out in post # 50. Divernan Feb 2015 #51
So what? nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #6
Yeah who gives a shit that politicians and banksters are in bed together. n/t benz380 Feb 2015 #7
So you are outraged that Chelsea Clinton married someone without getting your approval first? nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #8
Yeah no big deal that the undeclared Democratic candidate is in bed with the very people that ChosenUnWisely Feb 2015 #9
Hillary Clinton is sleeping with her son-in-law? MineralMan Feb 2015 #11
IF you say so, IDC who she sleeps with but if you do, have at it. ChosenUnWisely Feb 2015 #16
Well, see, you said she was "in bed with" someone. MineralMan Feb 2015 #18
Ahh your are a literalist then, OK ChosenUnWisely Feb 2015 #21
Cliches are tricky to use. You aren't using them well. MineralMan Feb 2015 #23
Your friend is trying--he/she is trying to bowl you over with his/her "vehicular!" MADem Feb 2015 #27
Well, I'm an expert on the English vehicular. MineralMan Feb 2015 #36
Now that entire post is a keeper.....for pure hilarity!!!! MADem Feb 2015 #26
I think the lack of response means he's trying to Dodge the issue. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #100
Yes, it's easy to get carried away! The best way to Ford that stream is to MADem Feb 2015 #111
You forgot to tell him to geek tragedy Feb 2015 #29
I call that, "The Call to Stupid," woo me with science Feb 2015 #33
Thank you for the fine compliment. MineralMan Feb 2015 #37
Actually, I consider what you do here woo me with science Feb 2015 #40
Good to know. Really. MineralMan Feb 2015 #41
"...for your little paycheck" What? MineralMan Feb 2015 #58
agree that mm's pretense of not knowing the meaning of 'in bed with' was manipulative == ND-Dem Feb 2015 #93
+1 Marr Feb 2015 #106
You really are unfamiliar with the "in bed with" idiom? n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2015 #38
Of course I'm familiar with that cliche. MineralMan Feb 2015 #39
here's what the man said" ND-Dem Feb 2015 #94
This message was self-deleted by its author Marr Feb 2015 #107
What specific personal relations and relevant careers of in-laws should be used to disqualify LanternWaste Feb 2015 #12
Well, apparently the sins of the son-in-law are now visited MineralMan Feb 2015 #19
You should delete that. Marr Feb 2015 #108
And a similar question, how many degrees of separation do you need from anyone accused of wrongdoing stevenleser Feb 2015 #54
Who is Hillary Clinton sleeping with? Is that what you're suggesting? MineralMan Feb 2015 #13
I know! It's all coincidence! woo me with science Feb 2015 #31
Is it safe to assume you'd react the same if this story was about a republican candidate's family? whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #44
Yes. Whom Chelsea Clinton marries is none of my--or your--fucking business. geek tragedy Feb 2015 #45
The implications go beyond the simple fact of who she married whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #47
No it really doesn't. It's just trashy gossip worthy of a tabloid. geek tragedy Feb 2015 #48
LOL Cali_Democrat Feb 2015 #52
Normally, I'm willing to give some of these stories the benefit of the doubt when there's a lot of hughee99 Feb 2015 #10
Yeah, this is silly. Son in Law? Is that to what the anti-Hillary crowd has reduced themselves? stevenleser Feb 2015 #43
I'm not a Hillary fan, and even I think this is stupid. hughee99 Feb 2015 #49
It would seem he's not a very good hedge fund manager. pa28 Feb 2015 #14
Nothing to see here. It's not like all of us other progressives don't have Goldman investing in us. Scuba Feb 2015 #15
+100. and we all have friends and relatives who are crooks, too. (just not as successful at ND-Dem Feb 2015 #95
So he pays himself $2M/yr to lose his investor's money, while similar hedge funds made Faryn Balyncd Feb 2015 #17
Great post. woo me with science Feb 2015 #35
If Hillary is like my mother-in-law, this would be bad for the Goldman Sachs CEO FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #20
He should've followed in his MIL's footsteps and..... wolfie001 Feb 2015 #42
Mezvinsky Sr.'s victims included family, friends, & his own mother-in-law. Divernan Feb 2015 #98
I'm voting for Hillary anyways. wolfie001 Feb 2015 #112
The Mezvinskys are a colorful lot. AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #53
Better Believe It!... SidDithers Feb 2015 #64
Can't defend the indefensible, so smear the messenger. Octafish Feb 2015 #99
Well, you would certainly know about indefensible messengers, octafish of DU... SidDithers Feb 2015 #105
BOOKMARK THIS. Octafish Feb 2015 #110
makign sure Lloyd Blankfeld DonCoquixote Feb 2015 #73
Is Hillary's son-in-law running for office? n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #76
isn't this an interesting little thread? grasswire Feb 2015 #77
It's All About Defending The Inevitable Front-Runner Who Hasn't Even Annouced Who's Setting Up... WillyT Feb 2015 #81
Ivan Pavlov would find them interesting. Rex Feb 2015 #84
+1 woo me with science Feb 2015 #86
Well, if you wanna be on the tee vee you gonna have to say the right things. Octafish Feb 2015 #87
Dick Scaife & his newspapers endorsed her last presidential run. Divernan Feb 2015 #97
+1 Marr Feb 2015 #109
kick for plutocracy woo me with science Feb 2015 #88
Impossible! nt NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #120
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Goldman Sachs CEO Key Inv...»Reply #69