Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Cha

(298,866 posts)

18. Just an FYI.. might be a coincidence.. maybe not..

Reply to Fred Sanders (Reply #3)

Tue Feb 17, 2015, 02:06 AM

Feb 2015

Eric Boehlert @EricBoehlert
Follow
wow. Obama's #Gallup approv rating today: 49% vs. W. Bush's approv rating on this day 8 yrs ago: 33%. (what success/failure looks like)
8:21 AM - 16 Feb 2015 115 Retweets 68 favorites

http://theobamadiary.com/2015/02/16/happy-presidents-day-2/

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ed Schultz thinks we should consider Ground Troops in ‘Religious War’ with ISIS [View all] neverforget Feb 2015 OP

We never do anything right. cwydro Feb 2015 #1

Lies resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths and quagmire versus Obama and no ground troops - no difference at all. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #3

Just an FYI.. might be a coincidence.. maybe not.. Cha Feb 2015 #18

doesn't the new War Powers request include ground troops? DrDan Feb 2015 #26

If you have not read the three page document....do not forget it was a blank cheque before. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #27

does it include the use of ground troops? DrDan Feb 2015 #30

there's no ******* comparison to what President Obama is doing to try and keep us safe and Cha Feb 2015 #12

The fact the limited authorization has a 3 year limit is driving the War Hawks mad with rage. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #28

Ed should stick to domestic affairs and union stuff, his foreign affairs knowledge is abysmal. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #2

Yeah he was for the Keystone pipeline too but he changed his mind neverforget Feb 2015 #5

Obama was for the pipeline? When? Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #6

No Ed Schultz neverforget Feb 2015 #7

Schultz? I see. Because the Teamsters wanted it for the temporary jobs? At least he changed. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #8

Two threads here now, one saying Matthews is beating the war drum, now this. merrily Feb 2015 #4

I'm going to guess More War! neverforget Feb 2015 #9

What the hell good would that do, Ed? Warpy Feb 2015 #10

It'd fatten the MIC's profits neverforget Feb 2015 #11

Plus, jobs for the unemployed, with no need to fund a retirement package. n/t winter is coming Feb 2015 #15

We won't like it? JonLP24 Feb 2015 #19

We already have ground troops in Iraq mwrguy Feb 2015 #13

we do but this would be on a scale like the 2003 invasion neverforget Feb 2015 #23

FFS, the last thing you should do is voluntarily escalate a religious war. winter is coming Feb 2015 #14

Ed Shultz is terrible JonLP24 Feb 2015 #16

He's pretty good on labor issues neverforget Feb 2015 #17

I liked him at first JonLP24 Feb 2015 #20

yeah. I don't get him but maybe that's the former Republican in him neverforget Feb 2015 #21

EDIT: freshwest Feb 2015 #22

That is what I was thinking. GE/MSNBC wanted every one to talk about the ISIS situation. Ed did. jwirr Feb 2015 #29

Your republican roots are showing again Ed. geomon666 Feb 2015 #24

IIRC, Ed originally supported the war in Iraq too. So at least he's a consistent KingCharlemagne Feb 2015 #25