Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Salt of the Earth Hillary Clinton wants $300,000 from you PLUS your vote [View all]BainsBane
(53,165 posts)151. I'm of advanced age myself
Last edited Wed Feb 25, 2015, 03:35 AM - Edit history (1)
My point was people have lived long enough to figure it out, except my guess (and it is just a guess) is that they have been fortunate enough that they only have recently begun to feel what many of us have experienced our entire lives. And I gave a series of reasons why it appears they do see the issue as new rather than systemic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
259 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Salt of the Earth Hillary Clinton wants $300,000 from you PLUS your vote [View all]
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
OP
We should just get our candidates from India on an H1B and pay them, like $5K, and no benefits
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#5
Lol, what a great idea, Globalization! Cheap labor. I like the H1B method, we are told it is
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#101
Absolutely, we must support corporate profits & globalization. But new H1-B Reps. are only for the
appalachiablue
Feb 2015
#250
That's known as the "1%'er fee." Pay to play, boys and girls. PAY TO PLAY.
blkmusclmachine
Feb 2015
#8
News flash: There is a Speakers Circuit out there and some folks get a lot of money
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#10
Speaking fees are indeed, a most heinous and grievous crime; and it's time people knew...
LanternWaste
Feb 2015
#204
Nope, the price is based on demand. Sorry, it's not as exciting as your conspiracy
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#77
Do you really not understand this? Do you think attendees of speeches pay for them? Nt
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#164
can you people debate anything without attacking others? in this thread alone, people have
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#175
students just *love* hillary. they all think it's worth $300K to hear her, and they're happy
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#100
Some folks just figured out there is a speakers circuit because someone they don't like is on it
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#13
women here (at DU and in the US) are *not* "considered the lowest common denominator".
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#118
Amazing how fast calling "sexist" on every DU critic of Hillary got old and transparent, isn't it?
merrily
Feb 2015
#160
and how old it's gotten, and how hopeless it makes me feel. what kind of solidarity can
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#178
"for the first time, people of advanced age have decided that income inequality...is a problem"
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#42
right because those people "of advanced age" never once complained about income inequality
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#95
Now you're trying to rationalize your BS charge: this time *you're* old, but unprivileged,
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#159
Brilliant rant, BB. Some will deliberately misunderstand you, but you got it right.
Hekate
Feb 2015
#116
yes, using ageist slurs to pretend people are racist and sexist is a brilliant technique.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#139
Okay Einstein, then why do all the Hillary haters all tend to like Elizabeth Warren? Sexist? Nt
Logical
Feb 2015
#50
because the hillary haters are all so old. according to the poster. though it doesn't make
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#97
please explain then her meaning then, because i didn't deliberately misunderstand anything.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#120
You mean you can't explain, because it's clear what the poster meant. She meant old
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#132
you support clinton because (you perceive) some people see putin as a hero? i see why
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#99
he apparently gets way less than anyone else, including ex-vps and failed presidential
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#54
I make minimum wage. I'm not willing to pay *anyone* diddly to give a speech. But if
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#65
Clinton doesn’t have to wait “for these folks to get their act together.”
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#22
i wonder who they are, those folks who take so long to get their act together, and where
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#180
Or the two teleprompters and special podium. After all if you are going to save the middle class
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#27
For $300,000 she can buy her own gd wedges. A rock star can be afforded arrogance. They are not
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#31
Yes, of course, Goldman Sachs is OK with it too. I'm glad the lower classes keep you amused. Too bad
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#45
well, fuck us, do you think she'll make her speeches to anyone who can't afford $300,000 or
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#37
More correctly, it takes money to buy an election. And she's buying this one.
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#40
Name a politician who won that didn't have the financial backing in the last 30 years?
still_one
Feb 2015
#46
For someone who doesn't want to talk to me, you sure are talking to me a lot. I guess
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#135
and she's got plenty of it..I loved it when, after her 2008 run, she went around
whathehell
Feb 2015
#161
Yes, she will. When the time comes she will speak in some big open venue and it will be free.
Hekate
Feb 2015
#181
"Clinton went to a different part of town and held a fundraiser at a very rich person's home,
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#188
Maybe, or might be what he charges. Elizabeth Warren as an example usually doesn't take a fee
still_one
Feb 2015
#55
You are right. However, as a Senator, Warren is prohibited from taking speaking fee
still_one
Feb 2015
#67
however, it's apparently because sitting congresspeople have to donate their speaking fees
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#167
Hey, give her a break, she was in near poverty when she left the White House!!! nt
Logical
Feb 2015
#33
So poor, her daughter had to work for $600,000 at NBC as a special correspondent to help
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#93
yeah, poor chelsea had to go out at a young age to support bill and hill. luckily she was
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#106
Yes, she's unbearable. Tone deaf, entitled 1%er who should run as a republican since she
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#39
I'm no fan of HRC and will not vote for her in the primary, but I think
KingCharlemagne
Feb 2015
#210
So is Charlie Sheen. I'm pretty sure he gets high fees and wouldn't be a good president.
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#47
Hillary Clinton would be a horrible President. More poverty, more jobs to Asia, higher CEO pay, low
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#51
It's a violation of DU's terms of service, so you take your chances. You also risk a hide.
merrily
Feb 2015
#169
Do you hate JFK and FDR, too? As I remember, they were pretty rich. Can the rich not allow
CAG
Feb 2015
#59
JFK and FDR didn't charge $300,000 a speech during time of the worst income disparity in US history
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#69
wow - you are insulting JFK & FDR in order to buff up Hillary? That's very third way of you.
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#89
Silly. Both JFK and FDR inherited their money from their fathers, grandfathers, and in the case of
Hekate
Feb 2015
#142
It's almost like he's got a meme-generator that flags words and riffs off them randomly
Hekate
Feb 2015
#186
What you doubt is not the issue. Hillarys fees are not out of line with other
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#171
Hillafarian pill heads paying $300,000 to hear her lip sync and pander...
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#73
Most speakers of her notariety expect certain things. But I do have a question
rpannier
Feb 2015
#86
Still water as in "don't make waves". A Democrat only a conservative would love.
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#90
If it's coming out of a tap, it's moving, not still. If it's moving through pipes, it's moving.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#141
are you serious? you don't know what still water is? (sorry, i refuse to be so puerile as
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#147
who pays for a speech given to students at a university? unless some private party made
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#102
Where do you think that budget money comes from? Unless it comes from some billionaire's
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#115
Poster pretends to not know that universities have major funders and endowments for such things
Hekate
Feb 2015
#155
I did specify "little or nothing" for the students. UCSB has a terrific Arts & Lectures program....
Hekate
Feb 2015
#176
well, i suppose we'd have to check out each university individually to see exactly where
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#192
Hillary is selling future favors for $300,000. The 1% are buying future favors for $300,000. That's
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#105
What misleading Bullshit. There's backers and there's voters, and they're not the same.
Hekate
Feb 2015
#108
she's 5'7". not exactly 'short' for a woman. she's a couple of inches taller than the US average
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#184
Its even more bullshit than that. Her speech was funded by a University endowment
onenote
Feb 2015
#226
I think most of the people in the film were non-professionals. But Grandpa Walton was in it.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#177
Bwahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Sure, Goldman and Citi pay her to fill seats. Yeah, that's it.
Scuba
Feb 2015
#195
Tap water in a paper cup, a crust of dry bread, a hard bench, a light shining in his eyes.
Hekate
Feb 2015
#242
When you have to distort to make your point, you probably don't have a point worth making
onenote
Feb 2015
#219
One more time for clarity 's sake: the $300,000 was paid out of an endowment. Tickets were free
onenote
Feb 2015
#230
...The speech was a fundraiser. Tickets cost $100 and up. Attendance was about 1800 because
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#237
Because we need overpaid Wall Street shills stumping for overpaid Wall Street CEOs, Hillary
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#251