Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Economist Proves: Reagan’s Deregulation caused Today’s Income Inequality. [View all]
https://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/economist-proves-reagans-deregulation-caused-todays-income-inequality/Source info aplenty at the link.
Finally, the root cause is revealed. Plenty of talk has been talked on the topic, by experts, data wonks, and politicians. But nobody was able to say why the 1% started f***ing the rest of us to an even greater extent than hitherto, from the 80s through the present day. Not until a few months ago, that is:
There are many gauges of the depth and breadth of economic inequality, and they often measure what middle-income working people have today against what they had prior to 1980 that time when homes were affordable, along with doctor visits and college educations. Yet few of the astonishing charts and metrics that have captured this widening gulf explain how it all came about. So when economist William Lazonick pointed a finger at a very specific aspect of corporate behavior, people took note.
Lazonicks 4,900-word piece, titled Profits Without Prosperity, focused on the 449 companies in the Standard & Poors 500 index that were publicly listed from 2003 to 2012. Lazonick found that from the end of World War II until the late 1970s, corporations generally took a retain-and-reinvest approach to profits. That is, they kept their earnings and reinvested them first and foremost in pay raises and job benefits for the employees who helped make the firms more competitive, but also in business expansion, research and new technologies.
But starting in the early 1980s, after the Securities and Exchange Commission removed limits on companies power to buy back their stock, these large, publicly traded companies began spending a portion of their net income on stock buybacks. The trend was exacerbated in the 1990s, when the compensation packages of corporate chief executives were linked directly to the stock value, and has accelerated in recent years even though its been little noticed and rarely discussed as a prime driver of economic inequality.
THIS IS HUGE, Gentle Reader. Huge. It proves what everyone except Teapubbies and all the other small government and supply-side eedjits have known for decades: the Reagan Revolution was a huge mistake, a f***-up for the ages, even worse than when the Senate handed Rome to Caligula. The nations woeful retreat from its former stability to the shambles of the present day is, once and for all: The. Fault. Of. Reagan. Era. Republicans.
And the longer America keep electing these criminally idiotic, venal, fact-challenged, big-mouthed-but-walnut-brained f***wits, the worse its gonna get. We need to vote each and every Republican who is currently IN office OUT of said office. And that soon.
Maybe someday, when Repubs go back to the pre-Reagan days of ideological and political sanity; then, and ONLY then, can we allow them back into power. But frankly, friends, we cant AFFORD these Teapublican nitwits any longer. They have cost us dearly, far too dearly, and done far too much damage to be trusted now.
Now you know who to blame. Time to do something about it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
107 replies, 6666 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (93)
ReplyReply to this post
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Economist Proves: Reagan’s Deregulation caused Today’s Income Inequality. [View all]
riqster
Feb 2015
OP
That was bad & a big part of it. Never met anyone who switched thank God, or admitted it.
appalachiablue
Mar 2015
#103
riqster is correct. I know it's impossible to tell these days around here.
stillwaiting
Feb 2015
#34
The OP states the stock buybacks (allowed under Reagan) benefit the CEOs and investors
brush
Feb 2015
#17
All true except just getting Republicans out! Corporations and the 1% own quite a few
Dustlawyer
Feb 2015
#6
Never thought anything different about his crackpot economic theories.
greatauntoftriplets
Feb 2015
#8
The turn back to oil, deregulation, disengagement from third world development
SoLeftIAmRight
Feb 2015
#11
First things first. Everyone who reads this needs to forward this and the evidence to the WH with
jwirr
Feb 2015
#20
He should get that idea from the article. Time to realize that playing ball with the Rs is not the
jwirr
Feb 2015
#28
Yes. It is time to use the DU activist abilities. We are good at this kind of action.
jwirr
Feb 2015
#32
While Blaming Regan may feel good, the truth is nowhere near as simple.
One_Life_To_Give
Feb 2015
#53
No shit and fucking DUH, now are we going to fix it or are we going to keep "meeting in the middle"
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#68
Thom Hartmann talks about this a lot, and says this is why the tax rate needs to be higher
cui bono
Feb 2015
#87
More proof that America was hijacked by economic terrorists / insurgents
AZ Progressive
Mar 2015
#99
1980s Sherman Anti Trust Act (anti monopolies) & Fairness Doctrine not enforced-
appalachiablue
Mar 2015
#105