Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

riqster

(13,986 posts)
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 09:51 AM Feb 2015

Economist Proves: Reagan’s Deregulation caused Today’s Income Inequality. [View all]

https://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/economist-proves-reagans-deregulation-caused-todays-income-inequality/

Source info aplenty at the link.

Finally, the root cause is revealed. Plenty of talk has been talked on the topic, by experts, data wonks, and politicians. But nobody was able to say why the 1% started f***ing the rest of us to an even greater extent than hitherto, from the 80’s through the present day. Not until a few months ago, that is:

There are many gauges of the depth and breadth of economic inequality, and they often measure what middle-income working people have today against what they had prior to 1980 – that time when homes were affordable, along with doctor visits and college educations. Yet few of the astonishing charts and metrics that have captured this widening gulf explain how it all came about. So when economist William Lazonick pointed a finger at a very specific aspect of corporate behavior, people took note.

Lazonick’s 4,900-word piece, titled Profits Without Prosperity, focused on the 449 companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index that were publicly listed from 2003 to 2012. Lazonick found that from the end of World War II until the late 1970s, corporations generally took a “retain-and-reinvest” approach to profits. That is, they kept their earnings and reinvested them – first and foremost in pay raises and job benefits for the employees who helped make the firms more competitive, but also in business expansion, research and new technologies.

But starting in the early 1980s, after the Securities and Exchange Commission removed limits on companies’ power to buy back their stock, these large, publicly traded companies began spending a portion of their net income on stock buybacks.
The trend was exacerbated in the 1990s, when the compensation packages of corporate chief executives were linked directly to the stock value, and has accelerated in recent years – even though it’s been little noticed and rarely discussed as a prime driver of economic inequality.

THIS IS HUGE, Gentle Reader. Huge. It proves what everyone except Teapubbies and all the other “small government” and supply-side eedjits have known for decades: the Reagan Revolution was a huge mistake, a f***-up for the ages, even worse than when the Senate handed Rome to Caligula. The nation’s woeful retreat from its former stability to the shambles of the present day is, once and for all: The. Fault. Of. Reagan. Era. Republicans.

And the longer America keep electing these criminally idiotic, venal, fact-challenged, big-mouthed-but-walnut-brained f***wits, the worse it’s gonna get. We need to vote each and every “Republican” who is currently IN office OUT of said office. And that soon.

Maybe someday, when Repubs go back to the pre-Reagan days of ideological and political sanity; then, and ONLY then, can we allow them back into power. But frankly, friends, we can’t AFFORD these Teapublican nitwits any longer. They have cost us dearly, far too dearly, and done far too much damage to be trusted now.

Now you know who to blame. Time to do something about it.
107 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K&R abelenkpe Feb 2015 #1
T&Y riqster Feb 2015 #2
"the Reagan Revolution was a huge mistake, a f***-up for the ages..." deutsey Feb 2015 #3
I love throwing their phrase back in their faces. riqster Feb 2015 #12
The Reagan Revolution meme: AlbertCat Feb 2015 #36
True. riqster Feb 2015 #45
But it wasn't a fuckup. It was a carefully planned strategy hifiguy Feb 2015 #56
Maybe the fuck-up was that so many in the middle class deutsey Feb 2015 #62
+1 riqster Feb 2015 #72
That was bad & a big part of it. Never met anyone who switched thank God, or admitted it. appalachiablue Mar 2015 #103
Yep, "welfare queens" and abortion... KatyMan Feb 2015 #78
Yet if there were jobs daredtowork Feb 2015 #92
Very true! riqster Mar 2015 #97
+10 appalachiablue Mar 2015 #104
Good piece. nt ladjf Feb 2015 #4
Thanks. riqster Feb 2015 #13
But stock buybacks are good for workers I've been told on DU. stillwaiting Feb 2015 #5
Lol! riqster Feb 2015 #16
Hope so! brush Feb 2015 #30
riqster is correct. I know it's impossible to tell these days around here. stillwaiting Feb 2015 #34
Modern corporate governance is misguided. riqster Feb 2015 #35
Yes, "shareholder value" above all. amandabeech Feb 2015 #66
And employee retention. riqster Feb 2015 #69
Absolutely! But they don't teach you that at the big B-schools. amandabeech Feb 2015 #71
Just so. riqster Feb 2015 #73
The OP states the stock buybacks (allowed under Reagan) benefit the CEOs and investors brush Feb 2015 #17
I interpreted stillwaiting's post as ironic. riqster Feb 2015 #27
Trolls and apologists gonna troll and apologize hifiguy Feb 2015 #58
See post 34. riqster Feb 2015 #64
Pretty sure hifiguy wasn't calling me a troll. stillwaiting Feb 2015 #74
Amen. I use the sarcasm icon. A lot. riqster Feb 2015 #75
I almost always do. Updated my orig. post to clear up any confusion. stillwaiting Feb 2015 #76
Thanks back atcha. riqster Feb 2015 #77
You are correct! hifiguy Feb 2015 #80
All true except just getting Republicans out! Corporations and the 1% own quite a few Dustlawyer Feb 2015 #6
That is true, and I completely agree. riqster Feb 2015 #10
must read later. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2015 #7
It's worth it. riqster Feb 2015 #9
Never thought anything different about his crackpot economic theories. greatauntoftriplets Feb 2015 #8
Nor I. riqster Feb 2015 #15
Never thought anything different about his crackpot economic theories. AlbertCat Feb 2015 #39
Laffer was and is laughable. riqster Feb 2015 #48
Laffer was and is laughable. AlbertCat Feb 2015 #60
A thing of positively Gordian beauty! riqster Feb 2015 #63
That looks like Reagan's dick, fucking the American citizenry blackspade Mar 2015 #93
Brain Bleach! riqster Mar 2015 #98
He he blackspade Mar 2015 #100
The turn back to oil, deregulation, disengagement from third world development SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2015 #11
S'truth. riqster Feb 2015 #14
The idjuts that call themselves libertarians, for sure... freebrew Feb 2015 #40
Fair point. riqster Feb 2015 #41
Thx.. freebrew Feb 2015 #43
Piketty supports this also wouldsman Feb 2015 #18
Piketty I respect. riqster Feb 2015 #22
That was the whole idea. Hissyspit Feb 2015 #19
Yep. riqster Feb 2015 #23
First things first. Everyone who reads this needs to forward this and the evidence to the WH with jwirr Feb 2015 #20
Good idea. riqster Feb 2015 #24
He should get that idea from the article. Time to realize that playing ball with the Rs is not the jwirr Feb 2015 #28
Yep. I meant that we also need to pass this along to others as well. riqster Feb 2015 #31
Yes. It is time to use the DU activist abilities. We are good at this kind of action. jwirr Feb 2015 #32
Agreed. riqster Feb 2015 #33
Instead of investing in their companies they cashed out GusBob Feb 2015 #21
Oh hellz yeah. riqster Feb 2015 #25
When the gov't proclaimed we were to go metric... freebrew Feb 2015 #42
It goes back to the 19th century here, but... riqster Feb 2015 #47
Did anyone find a link to Lazonick's paper? prairierose Feb 2015 #26
It's buried in the blog post. riqster Feb 2015 #29
Thank you rigster.... prairierose Feb 2015 #37
Me too. riqster Feb 2015 #38
"first Wall Street insider to lead the commission (SEC) in 50 years" One_Life_To_Give Feb 2015 #44
That's MISTER Fox to you! riqster Feb 2015 #46
Reaganomics worked great for those with Big Money. Octafish Feb 2015 #49
Quite welcome. riqster Feb 2015 #50
Lost cause? draytontiffanie Feb 2015 #51
My occupational therapist told me to specialize in lost causes. riqster Feb 2015 #52
While Blaming Regan may feel good, the truth is nowhere near as simple. One_Life_To_Give Feb 2015 #53
Point taken. Inequality as a phenomenon goes back millennia. riqster Feb 2015 #55
Weakening the 1930's reforms was huge, but still only a part. One_Life_To_Give Feb 2015 #59
Can't quarrel with that. riqster Feb 2015 #61
kr ND-Dem Feb 2015 #54
ty riqster Feb 2015 #57
Another thing we can thank Reagan for. Initech Feb 2015 #65
Ike was the last decent Republican Prexy. riqster Feb 2015 #67
No shit and fucking DUH, now are we going to fix it or are we going to keep "meeting in the middle" TheKentuckian Feb 2015 #68
Having an academically sound case can help us fix the problem. riqster Feb 2015 #70
While I agree that Reagan was a supreme asshole, TBF Feb 2015 #79
Reagan was good, but imperfect Yorktown Feb 2015 #81
I disagree. riqster Feb 2015 #84
What "dangerous path toward overadministration and regulation" was that? n/t cui bono Feb 2015 #91
Evidently, Carter was a Marxist or something. riqster Mar 2015 #101
And Reagan lifted morale by firing all the air traffic controllers. cui bono Mar 2015 #107
Um, no. Reagan was not good. blackspade Mar 2015 #96
Kick this into the faces of the corporatists. JEB Feb 2015 #82
That's the idea. riqster Feb 2015 #83
That Paper is Months Old - Why Haven't We Seen Action? daredtowork Feb 2015 #85
Probably because nobody made noise about it. riqster Feb 2015 #88
No shit JonLP24 Feb 2015 #86
Yep. This shows us what started the income inequality explosion of our times. riqster Feb 2015 #89
Thom Hartmann talks about this a lot, and says this is why the tax rate needs to be higher cui bono Feb 2015 #87
It's the rate and the accompanying regulations. riqster Feb 2015 #90
K&R Some labor for it, some against. nt raouldukelives Mar 2015 #94
And those who labor against are losing. riqster Mar 2015 #95
More proof that America was hijacked by economic terrorists / insurgents AZ Progressive Mar 2015 #99
Yep. This proof needs spread far and wide. riqster Mar 2015 #102
1980s Sherman Anti Trust Act (anti monopolies) & Fairness Doctrine not enforced- appalachiablue Mar 2015 #105
Yep, that is another bit of Reaganism that caused a lot of damage. riqster Mar 2015 #106
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Economist Proves: Reagan’...