General Discussion

TheCowsCameHome

(40,169 posts)

11. Actually, I was thinking more of Jeb.

Reply to Romeo.lima333 (Reply #8)

Thu Mar 5, 2015, 12:11 PM

Mar 2015

He has the uncanny knack of pissing everyone off.

A real consensus builder.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

110 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I am off the Hillary bandwagon [View all] Harmony Blue Mar 2015 OP

All those solid arguments by anti-Hillary posters rock Mar 2015 #1

+1 Fecal matter. Scat. Ca-ca. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #55

Indeed. BainsBane Mar 2015 #87

I'm not anti-Hillary but why . . . brush Mar 2015 #104

I know what you mean. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2015 #2

yea really, im sure scott walker is gonna be a much better candidate Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #8

Actually, I was thinking more of Jeb. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2015 #11

Understand the corporations will take either candidate left on the general ballot! TheNutcracker Mar 2015 #60

Can't wait to see who the right offers up to save America. left-of-center2012 Mar 2015 #19

Oh, my. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2015 #44

It just won't be the same, though. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #103

they offered us Hillary Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #72

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #106

I was never on it to begin with. HappyMe Mar 2015 #3

I used a private email while a Federal employee too.... Adrahil Mar 2015 #4

Were your communications.. sendero Mar 2015 #6

Yep. But the Federal system sucked. Adrahil Mar 2015 #9

Well.. sendero Mar 2015 #28

This is then a copout for those with legislative responsibilities to take this attitude... cascadiance Mar 2015 #41

I didn't say the Federal systems shouldn't be fixed.... Adrahil Mar 2015 #58

But we don't KNOW that the records are available when they are privately managed... cascadiance Mar 2015 #64

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #107

Good points. If the system is that bad, and it apparently is, it was an opportunity to address sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #77

I'm willing to give Hillary the benefit of the doubt now for not doing "bad things" with this email cascadiance Mar 2015 #96

I believe your account of the system sammythecat Mar 2015 #69

Was she REQUIRED, or was it merely policy? Adrahil Mar 2015 #85

Well, first I just want to say again sammythecat Mar 2015 #99

Depends on how sensitive the information was. HappyMe Mar 2015 #7

Never used it for sensitive information. n/t Adrahil Mar 2015 #10

Good thing you aren't running for president. HappyMe Mar 2015 #15

Well, the job needed doing and the official system wasn't suitable... Adrahil Mar 2015 #18

People should have worked to change it then. HappyMe Mar 2015 #25

Hmmm... 2naSalit Mar 2015 #34

I wasn't talking about Clinton when I said that. HappyMe Mar 2015 #39

People DID work to change it. They still are. Adrahil Mar 2015 #59

I'm laughing at all the people on DU coming forward to say they used TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #24

Well, a guess condescension is one way to go. Adrahil Mar 2015 #62

No. Peons don't matter. I'm baffled that anyone thinks their personal habits in the TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #63

Well, at least your honest, I guess. Adrahil Mar 2015 #83

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #108

Come on! You weren't the Sec. of State . . . brush Mar 2015 #65

Ditto. Faux pas Mar 2015 #5

Yup. This makes me think what other new messes do we not know about that might come out. dissentient Mar 2015 #12

As Carl sagan once said, justhanginon Mar 2015 #49

I'm not a HRC Supporter fredamae Mar 2015 #13

I'm not an HRC supporter either -- I tend towards Sanders at this point -- but your post KingCharlemagne Mar 2015 #22

+1 2naSalit Mar 2015 #37

Yours is a voice of reason n/t War Horse Mar 2015 #56

There are enough facts TM99 Mar 2015 #73

I was never on it, but not because of the e-mails. bigwillq Mar 2015 #14

Same here. mylye2222 Mar 2015 #20

I have never been on the bandwagon - but - this 'scandal' is being overblown by blm Mar 2015 #16

You are probably right. mylye2222 Mar 2015 #26

I don't know any other cabinet secretary who developed a private domain HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #46

I hope she didn't compromise Project X TheCowsCameHome Mar 2015 #17

The rooster crowed at midnight. That's no problem. HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #51

I never thought of them. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2015 #61

The significant owl hoots in the night. Hekate Mar 2015 #78

As I said in other posts, if this is as severe as some suggest, then why not demand ALL members of still_one Mar 2015 #21

+10000000000000000000!!! 2naSalit Mar 2015 #40

Thanks, you absolutely got my drift still_one Mar 2015 #42

One of the absolutely best suggestions I've seen on this issue. 2naSalit Mar 2015 #47

heheh….exactly blm Mar 2015 #50

i would be surprised if you were ever on hillary bandwagon. where you? seabeyond Mar 2015 #23

My thought exactly. BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #32

"Email-gate". How original. randome Mar 2015 #27

Worse than Benghazi...there is no there there. Nada, nothing. please move on. nt kelliekat44 Mar 2015 #29

lol NCTraveler Mar 2015 #30

I'll vote for Jim Webb or Martin O'Malley, whoever else runs in the primary. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #31

Ditto B2G Mar 2015 #33

I like Warren, but I doubt she'll run. So, yeah. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #35

I don't either B2G Mar 2015 #48

Depressed? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #36

You know what? You are always a class act. Autumn Mar 2015 #88

Thanks. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #90

Plenty of time to get on a bandwagon later. Orsino Mar 2015 #38

I was willing to give Sec. Clinton the benefit of a doubt until I heard about the Sarcastica Mar 2015 #43

Did you really just call Carole King a hag? Jamastiene Mar 2015 #68

Perhaps Sarcastica was being...sarcastic? It's a theory, anyways. randome Mar 2015 #70

She may be fine for a PBS Telethon, or an oldies review in the Holiday Inn Lounge, but for the Sarcastica Mar 2015 #71

while I do get the gist of your post Skittles Mar 2015 #89

Some people who were not in her bandwagon... Annoying_Ashley Mar 2015 #45

Maybe MosheFeingold Mar 2015 #52

Oooo, Bush and Clinton are the same? Ralphie, is that you? nt Hekate Mar 2015 #91

I don't know who Ralphie is MosheFeingold Mar 2015 #93

Ralph Nader, who informed us there was not a dime's worth of difference between Bush and Gore. Hekate Mar 2015 #94

I'll take almost anyone else but Hillary MosheFeingold Mar 2015 #95

She's highly accomplished in her own right. She was never just some politician's wife. If you want Hekate Mar 2015 #97

And then there is the shadow of the blue dress in the picture libodem Mar 2015 #53

THAT? You're kidding. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #54

which means you never really were. wyldwolf Mar 2015 #57

Well, she did just tell State to release all her emails. Jamastiene Mar 2015 #66

But the State Department doesn't have all of her emails. nt DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2015 #81

The question, of course, will remain: Who does? Why this whole mess was SO unnecessary and easily avoidable. InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2015 #110

One question beyond the legal one, how many spy agencies hacked her emails? LittleBlue Mar 2015 #67

On one hand, she shouldn't have had anything sensitive or classified on there, by law. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #74

If you spook that easily, you may have not really been on it. mmonk Mar 2015 #75

BREAKING: I have it on good authority that Hillary Clinton once tore the tag off a mattress... brooklynite Mar 2015 #76

I never got on. Too much baggage on it. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2015 #79

I was never on it. nt City Lights Mar 2015 #80

Pfft. Give it up -- you were never "on" it in the first place. Hekate Mar 2015 #82

+1 mmonk Mar 2015 #84

+1 BainsBane Mar 2015 #86

... tenderfoot Mar 2015 #98

Benghazi B Calm Mar 2015 #92

Tho I never was on that particular bandwagon... 99Forever Mar 2015 #100

Really? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #101

Email gate is a bad joke Motown_Johnny Mar 2015 #102

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #105

It was just a fart in a hurricane. Buck up camper! Rex Mar 2015 #109