Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
2. Wouldn't it be *convenient* if these displaced workers could be used to decimate the middle class
Wed May 2, 2012, 04:49 PM
May 2012

here in the United States? Or at least a "happy accident"!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NAFTA put Mexican farmers out of business.. forcing them to look for jobs in the U.S. lib2DaBone May 2012 #1
"The large print giveth..." appal_jack May 2012 #16
Wouldn't it be *convenient* if these displaced workers could be used to decimate the middle class Romulox May 2012 #2
There are other cash crops that these Mexican farmers can turn to Xipe Totec May 2012 #3
Big kick. Thank you for this thread. n/t. polly7 May 2012 #4
A disaster. ForgoTheConsequence May 2012 #5
Plus it's an unintentional "fuck you" to Mexican farmers. Zalatix May 2012 #6
Clinton never should have gone along with the disaster called NAFTA, but he didn't negotiate Elwood P Dowd May 2012 #10
NAFTA Is Starving Mexico polly7 May 2012 #7
Thanks for posting. a la izquierda May 2012 #8
Oh that's just the beginning of the damage NAFTA did to Mexico MadHound May 2012 #9
Surprising Perceval May 2012 #11
NAFTA was a complete giveaway to American ag Recursion May 2012 #12
Now, now, let's give it a little time, shall we? gratuitous May 2012 #13
Ross was RIGHT! bvar22 May 2012 #14
Perot was a free trade monopolist starts at about the 5:00 minute mark. Uncle Joe May 2012 #15
..and that somehow invalidates his 1992 predictions on NAFTA and deregulated International Trade? bvar22 May 2012 #17
What Perot was speaking of was already happening. Uncle Joe May 2012 #19
Mexico and Canada were devastated during WWII? Err..... Romulox May 2012 #20
I agree your post is nonsense as I never said or implied that Canada or Mexico were devastated Errr.. Uncle Joe May 2012 #23
We're talking about NAFTA, a trade pact between the US, Mexico, Canada. It went into effect in 1994. Romulox May 2012 #27
We're talking about the increased need for U.S. industries to find cheap labor as Uncle Joe May 2012 #28
There was no "increased need" for cheap labor. You're advocating transfers from workers to corps. Romulox May 2012 #29
Only if you believe U.S. industry shouldn't remain competitive on the world stage. Uncle Joe May 2012 #31
Wow. This was a HUGE reason Gore lost in 2000, imo. A knife in the back to workers. nt Romulox May 2012 #21
#1. Gore didn't lose in 2000. Uncle Joe May 2012 #22
Gore betrayed workers, and CONTINUES to advocate for outsourcing (via Fisker) to this day. Romulox May 2012 #26
That conspiracy theory of mine is supported by logic, common sense, human nature and Uncle Joe May 2012 #30
And this is happening around the world - we are undercutting local businesses of all kinds and then jwirr May 2012 #18
Case in point, if I recall correctly: Monsato in India Zalatix May 2012 #25
Exactly. Also in Africa - destroying local farmers. jwirr May 2012 #32
Who was arguing in your last thread about how tariffs and subsidies Marr May 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Defenders of NAFTA might ...»Reply #2