Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts) Fri Mar 27, 2015, 07:29 PM Mar 2015

AP Reporting That Court Said They Did Not Commit the Crime - Better Than "Not Enough Evidence" [View all]

that is a strong exoneration

"In a rare decision, the supreme Court of Cassation overturned last year's convictions by a Florence appeals court and declined to order another trial. The judges declared that the two did not commit the crime, a stronger exoneration than merely finding that there wasn't enough evidence to convict."

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/018d6a0ba12845aba0dfa91adbef968e/lawyer-knoxs-ex-boyfriend-makes-final-court-appeal

The guilters must be going nuts!

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AP Reporting That Court Said They Did Not Commit the Crime - Better Than "Not Enough Evidence" [View all] TexasMommaWithAHat Mar 2015 OP

I'm not skyping with my older SIL JustAnotherGen Mar 2015 #1

At last Warpy Mar 2015 #2

When the realize that Amanda and Rafaelle TexasMommaWithAHat Mar 2015 #5

Yeah, I'm waiting on the other threads for guilters to show up riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #3

I get curious about motivations on things like this.. Fumesucker Mar 2015 #4

Agreed. I can't understand DUers who fell for this, esp ostensible legal beagles riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #6

I think the motivations were more basic than that Fumesucker Mar 2015 #8

Oh gauntlet thrown so I had to look it up. "Sadismo!" riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #12

When one's arguments are, without exception, in defense of state power morningfog Mar 2015 #11

Yes and when that's the case 100% of the time it becomes obvious nt riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #13

wouldn't be the first time around here. hobbit709 Mar 2015 #7

Here's my condensed version TexasMommaWithAHat Mar 2015 #9

Nice precis, you're a lot more familiar with the ins and the outs of it than I am.. Fumesucker Mar 2015 #10

I used to... TexasMommaWithAHat Mar 2015 #14

Considering that an Italian court convicted geologists of manslaughter for not accurately predicting tblue37 Mar 2015 #16

Ok, well I'm sort of a "guilter". Here's my opinion. DanTex Mar 2015 #17

I guess I'm glad you aren't a judge if you're going to base your opinion on so little riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #18

Well, obviously if I were a judge I would have a lot more knowledge about the case. DanTex Mar 2015 #20

Sorry, I fixed the link. Nt riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #21

If that one is a lawyer, I'm the King of Prussia. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2015 #19

I know right? riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #22

am kick! nt riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #15