General Discussion

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)

29. Odd that, innit?

Fri May 4, 2012, 09:10 AM

May 2012

One thing that possesses the active ingredient is banned outright as a public hazard, the other sold and regulated as equivalent because it too contains the active component...whereas the former does the trick, and the latter does not...
Sweet con if you can get everyone to agree that you're grift is a solid deal.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What do you think of Medical MJ and the Obama admin stance? [View all] quinnox May 2012 OP

Legalize completely is my longtime stance. MrSlayer May 2012 #1

Is there an option for even stronger disapproval than just "strongly disapprove"? Warren DeMontague May 2012 #2

I thought about that quinnox May 2012 #4

Medical Marijuana is legal....... murphyj87 May 2012 #7

I'm afraid JackInGreen May 2012 #17

However .... murphyj87 May 2012 #20

You'll get no argument from me JackInGreen May 2012 #24

That it's a right wing attempt to sow discord treestar May 2012 #3

thanks, there are several choices for you in the poll quinnox May 2012 #5

It is correct to prosecute for violations of the law, however treestar May 2012 #37

the prez can reschedule with the stroke of a pen.. frylock May 2012 #46

Prove that with a cite to the law treestar May 2012 #72

here you go.. frylock May 2012 #73

That says this: treestar May 2012 #74

DOJ is an arm of the Administration Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #57

Evidently there are no laws against torture.. Fumesucker May 2012 #6

Maybe there have been such prosecution? treestar May 2012 #36

Actually in this particular case I was demanding torture be prosecuted.. Fumesucker May 2012 #41

for fucks sake, that's the same lame bullshit the bush fanbois used.. frylock May 2012 #52

Last time I checked the RW not been closing MMJ clinics the last few years estiparanoic May 2012 #8

THat is hilarious treestar May 2012 #35

stats bear out that the obama doj is raiding facilities and making more arrests than bush.. frylock May 2012 #54

Who cares? A LOT OF US. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #11

Then do as I said and see Congress and your state people treestar May 2012 #34

I say this with respect RainDog May 2012 #49

There's no danger of me deciding who to vote for or not on the basis of something "treestar" says. Warren DeMontague May 2012 #69

"Do as I said"--wow, what an ego DisgustipatedinCA May 2012 #53

Yeah, so much better for the incarcerated chemo sick cancer patients to apologize and minimize Warren DeMontague May 2012 #68

No, the administration doesn't have to enforce the laws. tru May 2012 #14

THAT is what you depend on? treestar May 2012 #33

The administration is using a ridiculously broad interpretation of the commerce clause Warren DeMontague May 2012 #70

Agree completely. Right wing attempt to sow discord. FSogol May 2012 #44

Did you know? The guy on your avatar is a longtime drug warrior. KamaAina May 2012 #50

Legalize it. n/t DLevine May 2012 #9

I think the Prez is getting some seriously bad advice Mopar151 May 2012 #10

Yah, it's the gravy train and the asshat conventional wisdom crowd Warren DeMontague May 2012 #12

Don't care either way, but sick of hearing about it Sen. Walter Sobchak May 2012 #13

Thanks, Walter. tru May 2012 #15

Perhaps you would care if it was your family member suffering. n/t DLevine May 2012 #16

I appreciate JackInGreen May 2012 #18

Not to make light of your situation but... randome May 2012 #22

My oncologist JackInGreen May 2012 #23

Hmm.. a synthetic form of the active ingredient is legal.. Fumesucker May 2012 #25

Odd that, innit? JackInGreen May 2012 #29

It's not odd if you consider that a pill form is better in concept for your health than smoking. randome May 2012 #32

There's two arguments that make that talking point invalid.. Fumesucker May 2012 #43

you don't have to smoke it.. frylock May 2012 #58

Which is why I mentioned the pill form. randome May 2012 #64

you can vaporize the plant.. frylock May 2012 #66

If you followed this issue RainDog May 2012 #51

Yeah, because the war on drugs is completely unrelated to pressing issues like the economy. smokey nj May 2012 #27

It would be nice if War on Drug supporters just owned it: You support the War on Drugs because you Romulox May 2012 #47

+1 uponit7771 May 2012 #56

If its so unimportant, why are our prisons full of potheads? Warren DeMontague May 2012 #71

Why is "Fucking Appalled" not an option? CBGLuthier May 2012 #19

next time I will make a stronger option quinnox May 2012 #21

Legalize it.(n/t) Iggo May 2012 #26

Federally DeSchedule, Decrim & Regulate fredamae May 2012 #28

There are a few sayings in the bible I can get behind Tsiyu May 2012 #30

This isn't my only or even my largest problem.. 99Forever May 2012 #31

I am strongly against the policy, nevertheless I support Obama's handling of the question, bemildred May 2012 #38

The racist wingnuts hate him and would never vote for him... Bigmack May 2012 #39

We disagree. nt bemildred May 2012 #40

So he should continue incarcerating minorities at a massively disproportionate rate--to appease the Romulox May 2012 #48

The racists will not be appeased, no matter what he does, as the other poster noted. bemildred May 2012 #59

despite the fact a majority of people would like to see it decriminalized.. frylock May 2012 #61

Most people are against vast swathes of current government policy, but they don't vote that way. bemildred May 2012 #63

nice dodge frylock May 2012 #65

Thanks. bemildred May 2012 #67

so you believe that political expediency trumps doing what is right? frylock May 2012 #60

If Obama does it, it can be just as easily undone. bemildred May 2012 #62

I support the president, but he's dead-wrong here boxman15 May 2012 #42

Strongly against...although there's an argument to be made for "clueless" joeybee12 May 2012 #45

color me completely unstunned that Occulus May 2012 #55