Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
20. thanks Cha!
Sat May 2, 2015, 04:04 AM
May 2015
11 Stunning Images Highlight the Double Standard of Reactions to Riots Like Baltimore

By Derrick Clifton April 27, 2015

The city of Baltimore has been besieged by riots Monday night — and police are on the scene ready to serve, protect and subdue.

This has become an evergreen narrative in the aftermath of reactions to state-sanctioned violence against black people. But that it persists sends a troubling message about how officials and, by extension, many of the people they serve regard rioting: specifically, when there's white people involved versus mostly black people.

Usually, if a riot involves black people, it's connected to intense episodes of where systemic racism is undoubtedly at work. These episodes include the 1992 Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King beating verdict, the riots in Oakland after the 2009 BART Police shooting of Oscar Grant, and the national outcry immediately following the 1968 assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. That outcry included the city of Baltimore, where blacks now represent roughly 2 out of 3 residents.

But when a mob of mostly white people take to the streets, vandalizing cars, storefronts and street signs in the process it usually means someone either won or lost a game.

As Mic's Zak Cheney-Rice noted in January, these rioters are usually called "revelers," "celebrants" and "fans." They're not even called "rioters" in many cases. They're not derided as "criminals," "thugs," "pigs" or even "violent." Those descriptors, as events in Baltimore Monday night reveals yet again, are only reserved for black people. They're the ones who need to be quelled by militarized police forces. They're the ones who need to be off the streets, immediately. They're diminishing the validity of their cause. Yet somehow, reckless behavior over a sports team, not a systemic matter of life and death, is viewed as a costly nuisance.

read more: http://mic.com/articles/116680/11-stunning-images-highlight-the-double-standard-of-reactions-to-riots-like-baltimore
We need to see this and pass it on...thanks. libdem4life May 2015 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalElite May 2015 #2
This post should have hundreds of recs BumRushDaShow May 2015 #3
"There are DUers who can't see the hypocrisy" napkinz May 2015 #9
I don't think any of those are reasons to riot mythology May 2015 #4
this post is not about rioting as it is about PERCEPTIONS of what constitutes rioting napkinz May 2015 #7
+1 treestar May 2015 #23
Racism is racism is racism. Period. THIS POST is racial politics. democrat2thecore May 2015 #5
this post does not condone rioting ... it's about PERCEPTIONS of what constitutes rioting napkinz May 2015 #8
Sorry but BumRushDaShow May 2015 #12
I have been seriously considering Sanders for my vote gollygee May 2015 #25
Here in these United States we are free to say anything we like so far as we are ineffectual. hunter May 2015 #6
I'm white DashOneBravo May 2015 #10
Huge K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT May 2015 #11
you're welcome WillyT napkinz May 2015 #13
Two words: Cali_Democrat May 2015 #14
Well framed! Mahalo napkinz for these compelling graphics depicting the injustice. Cha May 2015 #15
thanks Cha! napkinz May 2015 #20
Thank you! Cha May 2015 #22
K & R RecoveringJournalist May 2015 #16
Love, love, love that poster. I wonder if Rand Paul thinks the kids rioting in KY (his state) had okaawhatever May 2015 #17
Rand Paul, Father Of The Year ;) napkinz May 2015 #27
... napkinz May 2015 #29
Big K and R! Gemini Cat May 2015 #18
... Jamaal510 May 2015 #19
Nobody ever said any of that was okay melman May 2015 #21
It doesn't result in a ton of media attention, and use of the words "thugs" and "monsters" gollygee May 2015 #26
it's not about condoning riots; it's about the HYPOCRISY in how the media report the actions napkinz May 2015 #28
Or when black people moved into their towns treestar May 2015 #24
K&R SalviaBlue May 2015 #30
thanks for changing your title questionseverything May 2015 #31
agreed Skittles May 2015 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When It's Okay To Riot (a...»Reply #20