Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fair critiques are fine. [View all]NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)74. It is getting a little Gowdy up in here.
One poster was trying to connect Hillary and the State Department to a weapons deal. Through further research, not by the poster making the claims, it was found out that not only did the person not get the deal, but that Clinton publicly questioned said persons character. The poster who brought the right wing tripe here wouldn't admit their failure and dishonesty. They simply went and started another Clinton smear op about emails, using a Gowdy preferred rag, along with accusations straight from Gowdy. They are transparent and their anti-Clinton tirades are continuing right now. Nine out of ten pieces posted by said person are attack pieces on progressives.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Government policy in general is unable to keep up with technological innovations...
Agschmid
Jun 2015
#17
I wasn't casting judgement. Just refuting your claim that it was some "modern manufacture."
Scootaloo
Jun 2015
#40
Sorry, but you don't get to define issues that are important to me as "stupid"
Ms. Toad
Jun 2015
#15
They are labeled a smear or right wing tactic when they are taken out of context
R B Garr
Jun 2015
#43