Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Re: the recent spate of "will you vote if_____?" - aka "loyalty" threads. [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)69. And when you set up your own board, you can care about that. (nt)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Re: the recent spate of "will you vote if_____?" - aka "loyalty" threads. [View all]
scarletwoman
Jun 2015
OP
I'm screencapping and archiving your reply here to use against you four to ten years from now.
NYC_SKP
Jun 2015
#7
They haven't got me banned yet, even though I'm pretty open about how I will not vote for Hillary
Maedhros
Jun 2015
#52
Don't worry you won't have to vote for Hillary because Bernie is going to be the nominee.
sabrina 1
Jun 2015
#83
When I say who I'm voting for, it's to allow me an opportunity to tell my acquaintances why I would
Ed Suspicious
Jun 2015
#10
The SCOTUS would not have gotten involved if Gore had 12,000 votes more than Bush
progree
Jun 2015
#33
Well, if Gore had been on top by 12,000 or more votes on the morning after election day
progree
Jun 2015
#93
Yup, I have a long list of that stuff in #14. And I agree that all of them, even Love Story,
progree
Jun 2015
#99
So what? (Another one to add to my list of the irrelevant that still doesn't come to grips
progree
Jun 2015
#32
We dealt with that in #54-#55. But thanks again and again for the repetition. nm
progree
Jun 2015
#61
No, 32 is still blaming it on Nader, and 14 still restricts all your analysis to FL.
jeff47
Jun 2015
#88
The Gore Campaign did INDEED calculate that they wouldn't need the Nader voters.
bvar22
Jun 2015
#102
way to early to commit oneself to a particular candidate IMO. fun watching tho nt
msongs
Jun 2015
#12
The Purists always show up and demand Party Purity around primary time. Meh.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2015
#19
"Recent"? Some characters have been demanding loyalty oaths for two years now.
Scootaloo
Jun 2015
#23
For the record, I don't give a rat's ass whether anybody in the DU bubble votes
MoonRiver
Jun 2015
#31
Stating that you'll vote for anything with a D next to it has consequences, too.
winter is coming
Jun 2015
#64
You are apparently under the mistaken impression that I care whether my opinion is taken seriously.
scarletwoman
Jun 2015
#72
I like to think that I have both a conscience and a heart & that they will guide my actions in 2016.
scarletwoman
Jun 2015
#74