Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So using hidden misogynic sexual vulgarities to express disagreements, according to some, should be [View all]uppityperson
(115,681 posts)106. Did you know Admin and the MIR team members can see banned troll's hidden posts?
He knew since he has been a moderator and now on MIRT.
He also did not copy/paste what the troll said, but took the term, capitalized the first letters, and made a joke of it.
So no. You are wrong in what you are saying here.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So using hidden misogynic sexual vulgarities to express disagreements, according to some, should be [View all]
still_one
Jun 2015
OP
He had copied the words of a Troll so they would be seen once MIRT did their work.
IdaBriggs
Jun 2015
#2
Which forum are you in? There are far more anti-Hillary threads, and most are not even locked
still_one
Jun 2015
#85
Ah, so he was DEFENDING Hillary? That would be rather out of character, but I suppose anything is
PeaceNikki
Jun 2015
#21
It sure appeared that he was agreeing with and laughing with the troll about the phrase.
PeaceNikki
Jun 2015
#92
He "decoded" the spoonerism for these guys and they still flail around saying they don't see it.
bettyellen
Jun 2015
#63
Well I don't believe him.. he's lying. Big surprise ..trying to weasel out of it now.
Cha
Jun 2015
#66
"And yes, it's a Cunning Stunt I say that to myself every day, over an over. It can be a tongue
Cha
Jun 2015
#71
Lol, Ida he is playing you- he understood the slur- and laughed in agreement. So now he's lied to
bettyellen
Jun 2015
#52
Sigh. Or my long time friend, with no prior history of EVER using such language
IdaBriggs
Jun 2015
#55
How about reading the post and his reply/ where he agrees with the troll and clearly uses the
bettyellen
Jun 2015
#59
And capitalizing the two words just to make sure everyone knew what he was saying.
zappaman
Jun 2015
#61
Clearly YOU are having a field day filled with oodles of Schadenfreude. It isn't pretty.
Bonobo
Jun 2015
#96
Except that is not what happened. Here are the 2 posts. Not defending from a troll at all
uppityperson
Jun 2015
#89
Did you know Admin and the MIR team members can see banned troll's hidden posts?
uppityperson
Jun 2015
#106
I haven't heard the word "kike" since the 80's. Saw it on multiple occasions today.
Ed Suspicious
Jun 2015
#75
Thanks - I wish the person claiming someone called Sanders a racist was as honest as you....
bettyellen
Jun 2015
#131
yeah, males compared to females have had it rough. From unequal pay, being treated and referred to
still_one
Jun 2015
#95
there is NO comparison. Women are the discriminated party in 99% of gender issues, NOT men
still_one
Jun 2015
#120
There was another Rude Pundit link posted where he called either Coulter or Bachmann "the word"...
cherokeeprogressive
Jun 2015
#39
I can't help but wonder if the target of the ugly mysogynistic post had been...
Spazito
Jun 2015
#23
If someone had said that about Elizabeth Warren.. they wouldn't be calling to get the person back.
Cha
Jun 2015
#62
A time out would have sufficed. I would feel the same if the male version were used.
mother earth
Jun 2015
#29
What's bothersome is the celebration. There's a bit more at play here, imho. The boards have been
mother earth
Jun 2015
#37
Not a day goes by on DU that I don't remember 13 people banned in about 2 hours.
ScreamingMeemie
Jun 2015
#60
"I remember when linking to hate sites was not allowed...and then the admins created one."
City Lights
Jun 2015
#108
If it were said about Eliazbeth Warren.. they wouldn't be calling for him to come back.
Cha
Jun 2015
#74
Exactly.. you didn't get me at all.. I don't mind.. someone already brought that post up to me..
Cha
Jun 2015
#136
And, turns out he wasn't the only one who brought that post up to me..and I talked about it here..
Cha
Jun 2015
#134
Of course we'll still be friends.. I'm friendly with the Bernie Supporters who are calling out the
Cha
Jun 2015
#143
So? I've already talked about that here.. And, if you think "morally depraved" is the same as..
Cha
Jun 2015
#129
Then why is racist crap still standing w/o even a hide after approximately 3 alerts? I don't get it
lonestarnot
Jun 2015
#87
I do think the jury system has brought down the standards of DU. I refuse to serve on it because it
still_one
Jun 2015
#112
My personal opinion: A lot of people are making the banning of someone too complicated.
BlueJazz
Jun 2015
#115
He didn't use the word, it was a "spoonerism" which means it was judged his intent was to use the
mother earth
Jun 2015
#132
So insinuating a word should carry a harsher punishment than saying the word itself? nt
Quackers
Jun 2015
#135