Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
12. 19 USC § 2191-2194
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 04:31 PM
Jun 2015
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/19/2191

For purposes of this section—
(1) The term “implementing bill” means only a bill of either House of Congress which is introduced as provided in subsection (c) of this section with respect to one or more trade agreements, or with respect to an extension described in section 3572 (c)(3) of this title, submitted to the House of Representatives and the Senate under section 2112 of this title, section 3572 of this title, or section 3805 (a)(1) of this title and which contains—
(A) a provision approving such trade agreement or agreements or such extension,
(B) a provision approving the statement of administrative action (if any) proposed to implement such trade agreement or agreements, and
(C) if changes in existing laws or new statutory authority is required to implement such trade agreement or agreements or such extension, provisions, necessary or appropriate to implement such trade agreement or agreements or such extension, either repealing or amending existing laws or providing new statutory authority.
(2) The term “implementing revenue bill or resolution” means an implementing bill, or approval resolution, which contains one or more revenue measures by reason of which it must originate in the House of Representatives.
(3) The term “approval resolution” means only a joint resolution of the two Houses of the Congress, the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: “That the Congress approves the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment with respect to the products of XXXX transmitted by the President to the Congress on XXXX.”, the first blank space being filled with the name of the country involved and the second blank space being filled with the appropriate date.


The President has to submit a signed treaty for TPA to apply, and the President must submit an implementing bill. A dispute over whether or not a bill qualifies would be referred to the Parliamentarian.
Interesting. I look forward to a discussion about this. northoftheborder Jun 2015 #1
Now it looks like people want to switch H-1B from immigration bill to "free trade" bills... cascadiance Jun 2015 #2
Here's an even better article about how TISA will let 'guest worker' programs have open season... cascadiance Jun 2015 #8
It sounds like farmers and ag companies help push passing TPA/TPP... cascadiance Jun 2015 #3
It's rightwing economic ideology period. mmonk Jun 2015 #4
I would too, but I need to help Bernie win the democratic primary this year... cascadiance Jun 2015 #5
I'm with you. But it all goes on how it goes with me. mmonk Jun 2015 #6
Yep, I understand and echo your anger too! cascadiance Jun 2015 #7
How does TPP or Fast Track Authority affect the filibuster Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2015 #9
I think we need to know what constitutes a trade bill and what doesn't. DO YOU KNOW? cascadiance Jun 2015 #10
Interesting Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2015 #11
I don't know this weakness to be there either, but I do feel this question needs to be asked... cascadiance Jun 2015 #13
The President has to submit a bill with a signed treaty Recursion Jun 2015 #14
But when that treaty creates something like an ISDS court... cascadiance Jun 2015 #15
We currently have ISDS with every potential TPP partner except Indonesia Recursion Jun 2015 #16
19 USC § 2191-2194 Recursion Jun 2015 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will TPA passage potentia...»Reply #12