Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PufPuf23

(8,854 posts)
2. What I recall is that the GWB admin used a non-federal email host
Wed Jul 1, 2015, 12:24 PM
Jul 2015

for years for most of the Executive branch and nothing of substance came of the event.

Worked for the GOP / Bushes and impacted the outcome of political crimes.

Here is summary (please excuse using wiki but I'm lazy):

Jump to: navigation, search


The Bush White House email controversy surfaced in 2007 during the controversy involving the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys. Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal White House emails were available, because they were sent via a non-government domain hosted on an email server not controlled by the federal government. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978, and the Hatch Act.[1] Over 5 million emails may have been lost or deleted.[2][3] Greg Palast claims to have come up with 500 of the Karl Rove lost emails, leading to damaging allegations.[4] In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been deleted.[5]

The administration officials had been using a private Internet domain, called gwb43.com, owned by and hosted on an email server run by the Republican National Committee,[6] for various communications of unknown content or purpose. The domain name is an acronym standing for "George W. Bush, 43rd" President of the United States. The server came public when it was discovered that J. Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, was using a gwb43.com email address to discuss the firing of the U.S. attorney for Arkansas.[7] Communications by federal employees were also found on georgewbush.com (registered to "Bush-Cheney '04, Inc."[8]) and rnchq.org (registered to "Republican National Committee"[9]), but, unlike these two servers, gwb43.com has no Web server connected to it — it is used only for email.[10]

The "gwb43.com" domain name was publicized by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), who sent a letter to Oversight and Government Reform Committee committee chairman Henry A. Waxman requesting an investigation.[11] Waxman sent a formal warning to the RNC, advising them to retain copies of all emails sent by White House employees. According to Waxman, "in some instances, White House officials were using nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications."[12] The Republican National Committee claims to have erased the emails, supposedly making them unavailable for Congressional investigators.[13]

On April 12, 2007, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel stated that White House staffers were told to use RNC accounts to "err on the side of avoiding violations of the Hatch Act, but they should also retain that information so it can be reviewed for the Presidential Records Act," and that "some employees ... have communicated about official business on those political email accounts."[14] Stanzel also said that even though RNC policy since 2004 has been to retain all emails of White House staff with RNC accounts, the staffers had the ability to delete the email themselves.

more at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_system

IMHO the Hillary Clinton Benghazi / email "scandal" is BS to smear HRC and the Dems.

OTOH HCR should never have put herself in the position that the email electron trail would go missing.

Nothing happened. OnyxCollie Jul 2015 #1
Thanks. You are a better poster than lazy me. nt. PufPuf23 Jul 2015 #4
What I recall is that the GWB admin used a non-federal email host PufPuf23 Jul 2015 #2
Gonzales... Gonzales... name sounds familiar HassleCat Jul 2015 #28
The Bush Administration cited Executive Privilege to withhold internal emails. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #3
No they didn't. former9thward Jul 2015 #6
Well, that should be interesting. nt Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #7
No it won't. The interesting stuff will be witheld. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #11
Yes, they did. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #10
You said: former9thward Jul 2015 #14
I was referring to the emails Bush withheld, which is the subject of the OP. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #17
Stop posting allegations without any proof on DU. former9thward Jul 2015 #18
Seriously? Pull up a chair. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #19
They do have it all. former9thward Jul 2015 #20
No, they don't. This word "all," you keep using it. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #21
Some, but not all. OnyxCollie Jul 2015 #23
Actually, the OP is about emails from an in-power working administration. OnyxCollie Jul 2015 #35
The issue with the NEPDG meeting is the Federal Advisory Committee Act. OnyxCollie Jul 2015 #22
Thank you. If anyone believes the Bush admin was ever truthful about anything, misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #29
Sure! Here's a sample. Orrex Jul 2015 #5
LOL! good one . . . nt Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #9
Sadly, that's a document released by the Obama-era Justice Department Orrex Jul 2015 #12
Oh, well it's different when it's not Bush doing it. arcane1 Jul 2015 #26
HaaHaaa! YUP misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #30
Okay, thanks to all. Lots of good info here. nt Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #8
Remember the fire in Cheney's office lame54 Jul 2015 #13
Fire doesn't destroy emails. former9thward Jul 2015 #15
it destroys hard-copies... lame54 Jul 2015 #16
It does when you have to put out the fire with axes and sledgehammers underpants Jul 2015 #33
The world will NEVER change if we base our behavior on the past behavior of people we hate. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #24
Probably not. But let's talk about Hillary to death Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2015 #25
Did anybody ever ask him to? LWolf Jul 2015 #27
Wouldn't have matter one bit. Bush boy was protected by Cheney's crime ring. misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #31
Who is defending Cheney? LWolf Jul 2015 #32
Pelosi didn't protect anyone. She knew Cheny covered his sorry ass. misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question--Did Team Bush e...»Reply #2