Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
19. Seriously? Pull up a chair.
Wed Jul 1, 2015, 06:11 PM
Jul 2015

Not only did they refuse to disclose internal emails, but emails with outside private companies/individuals. On his 10th day as vice president, Dick Cheney established a secret “Energy Task Force,” formally known as the National Energy Policy Development Group (NEPDG), for the purpose of making recommendations to President Bush on energy policy. In formulating a new energy strategy for America, the task force met secretly with lobbyists and representatives of the petroleum, coal, nuclear, natural gas, and electricity industries. Many of these individuals work for energy companies which gave large campaign contributionsto Bush/Cheney 2000. Environmental groups were mostly excluded from the task force.

Members of Congress demanded Cheney release the names of individuals and corporations who gave information and advice to the task force. But the vice president refused. After pressure from the General Accounting Office (GAO), the independent auditing arm of Congress, Cheney did release limited information about the task force. The GAO issued a report on the information and found several corporations and associations, including Chevron Corp. and the National Mining Association, gave detailed energy policy recommendations for the task force.

According to the GAO’s report, “senior agency officials” with the Department of Energy met “numerous times” with energy companies to provide advice to Cheney’s energy task force. Those companies include Bechtel, Chevron, American Coal Company, Small Refiners Association, the Coal Council, CSX, Kerr-McGee, Nuclear Energy Institute, the National Mining Association, General Motors, the National Petroleum Council, and the energy lobbying firm of Barbour, Griffith & Rogers. In addition, the Secretary of Energy discussed national energy policy with chief executive officers of petroleum, electricity, nuclear, coal, chemical, and natural gas companies, among others. The task force even sought and received advice from the disgraced and bankrupt Enron Corporation.

The GAO did not know whether Halliburton was one of the companies involved in making recommendations to the energy task force. And Cheney refused to release all the documents which can prove or disprove Halliburton’s involvement.

Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club filed a lawsuit in federal court to obtain the release of all of the task force records. The lawsuit argued that in 2001 Cheney violated the “open-government” law, known as the Federal Advisory Committee Act, by meeting behind closed doors with energy industry executives, analysts and lobbyists. A federal appeals court ruled in July 2003 that Cheney must supply all the information requested in the lawsuit. But Cheney continued to stonewall the request. On December 15, 2003, the Supreme Court announced it will hear Cheney’s appeal of the case. Three weeks later, Cheney and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia spent a weekend together duck hunting at a private resort in southern Louisiana, giving rise to calls for Scalia to recuse himself from Cheney’s appeal. What happened next was predictable.

Bush/Cheney got their way and denied public access to task force records that likely showed unprecedented corporate cronyism in the Bush administration, disproportionate influence over energy policy by Halliburton and other energy companies, and the true reasons for why the Bush administration demanded war with Iraq.

Here’s a link:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/05/11/court_backs_cheney_on_energy_meetings/

And that's just one example. For another example, see post 1 in this thread.

No, the National Archives do not have everything from Bush/Cheney. Not even close.

Nothing happened. OnyxCollie Jul 2015 #1
Thanks. You are a better poster than lazy me. nt. PufPuf23 Jul 2015 #4
What I recall is that the GWB admin used a non-federal email host PufPuf23 Jul 2015 #2
Gonzales... Gonzales... name sounds familiar HassleCat Jul 2015 #28
The Bush Administration cited Executive Privilege to withhold internal emails. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #3
No they didn't. former9thward Jul 2015 #6
Well, that should be interesting. nt Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #7
No it won't. The interesting stuff will be witheld. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #11
Yes, they did. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #10
You said: former9thward Jul 2015 #14
I was referring to the emails Bush withheld, which is the subject of the OP. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #17
Stop posting allegations without any proof on DU. former9thward Jul 2015 #18
Seriously? Pull up a chair. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #19
They do have it all. former9thward Jul 2015 #20
No, they don't. This word "all," you keep using it. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #21
Some, but not all. OnyxCollie Jul 2015 #23
Actually, the OP is about emails from an in-power working administration. OnyxCollie Jul 2015 #35
The issue with the NEPDG meeting is the Federal Advisory Committee Act. OnyxCollie Jul 2015 #22
Thank you. If anyone believes the Bush admin was ever truthful about anything, misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #29
Sure! Here's a sample. Orrex Jul 2015 #5
LOL! good one . . . nt Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #9
Sadly, that's a document released by the Obama-era Justice Department Orrex Jul 2015 #12
Oh, well it's different when it's not Bush doing it. arcane1 Jul 2015 #26
HaaHaaa! YUP misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #30
Okay, thanks to all. Lots of good info here. nt Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #8
Remember the fire in Cheney's office lame54 Jul 2015 #13
Fire doesn't destroy emails. former9thward Jul 2015 #15
it destroys hard-copies... lame54 Jul 2015 #16
It does when you have to put out the fire with axes and sledgehammers underpants Jul 2015 #33
The world will NEVER change if we base our behavior on the past behavior of people we hate. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #24
Probably not. But let's talk about Hillary to death Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2015 #25
Did anybody ever ask him to? LWolf Jul 2015 #27
Wouldn't have matter one bit. Bush boy was protected by Cheney's crime ring. misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #31
Who is defending Cheney? LWolf Jul 2015 #32
Pelosi didn't protect anyone. She knew Cheny covered his sorry ass. misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question--Did Team Bush e...»Reply #19