Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kcr

(15,522 posts)
51. And from some libertarians. Yes. Right wingers.
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 05:43 PM
Jul 2015

I tend to lump groups that are to the right of the center together and use the term right winger. I'm sorry if that confuses things. I never said no liberal ever supports this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Plural marriage and its challenges [View all] TygrBright Jul 2015 OP
Thank you Warpy Jul 2015 #1
There are other repulsive people like warren jeffs oberliner Jul 2015 #27
But the topic is polygamy. And over time it limits available women to only the wealthy. KittyWampus Jul 2015 #49
Here's what I suggest HassleCat Jul 2015 #2
You could say that about just one man and one woman, as well. Daemonaquila Jul 2015 #19
That's actually a pretty good point, and maybe one that deserves its own OP. TygrBright Jul 2015 #21
Polygyny = marriage of one man to two or more women raging moderate Jul 2015 #3
Yup. But it's a great strategy to get a GD post to float for a bit. TygrBright Jul 2015 #7
And yet you totally disregard the fact that... joeybee12 Jul 2015 #4
Wait...some posters are getting paid for advocating plural marriage? Chan790 Jul 2015 #40
Stop at historical evidence? Bad Thoughts Jul 2015 #5
+1 joeybee12 Jul 2015 #12
We will have it in 10 years. As with other changes, yeoman6987 Jul 2015 #35
ahhh, the old "It's never worked, so it'll never work" argument. TygrBright Jul 2015 #16
No, that's not what it is. kcr Jul 2015 #32
Sorry, but I'm not following you on that one. TygrBright Jul 2015 #33
You present no evidence that legalizing polygamy would evolve it in such a manner kcr Jul 2015 #41
Tyger Bright wants a conversation on how to legitimize polygamy riderinthestorm Jul 2015 #54
She and others also don't seem to be particularly interested kcr Jul 2015 #55
We can't legitimize anything that is not our own to legitimize. People who have such relationships Bluenorthwest Jul 2015 #6
If you look at the trajectory for the recognition of same-sex marriage... TygrBright Jul 2015 #8
It's not amiable because you ignored every single thing I said and then preached at me. Bluenorthwest Jul 2015 #15
Then I apologize to you, humbly and sincerely, for making my post a response to your comment. TygrBright Jul 2015 #17
And yet you still did not bother to address what I actually said. Bluenorthwest Jul 2015 #23
Again, my apologies. I did attempt to include your comment in my general round-up. TygrBright Jul 2015 #25
This needs to go away because it's painfully goddamned stupid. Spider Jerusalem Jul 2015 #9
It doesn't need to be legitimated; it needs to be LEGALLY legitimated! closeupready Jul 2015 #13
+1 joeybee12 Jul 2015 #14
Oh, look at thise horribke brown and black people do8ng something I disapproved of! AngryAmish Jul 2015 #18
WTF? You're apparently an idiot. Spider Jerusalem Jul 2015 #34
that's what communes are for snooper2 Jul 2015 #10
Polygamy is not my deal. You want one, go fight for it. closeupready Jul 2015 #11
No one says you have to and I like you regardless. TygrBright Jul 2015 #20
No problem, no offense taken - "I am Charlie" applies only closeupready Jul 2015 #22
If I saw most situations where more than two people, regardless of genders, SheilaT Jul 2015 #24
Monogamy has a long and repulsive history as a tool of the patriarchy oberliner Jul 2015 #26
True enough, and given the rhetorical level this discussion seems to devolve to... TygrBright Jul 2015 #28
Plural Marriage Has Nothing to Do with Civil Rights. MineralMan Jul 2015 #29
And I respect your opinion, and your right to have it. TygrBright Jul 2015 #31
Multi-person marriage will eventually become the law. BKH70041 Jul 2015 #30
The LGBT folks have provided a path for plural marriage advocates. JoePhilly Jul 2015 #36
You can't do that anymore than you can B2G Jul 2015 #37
Nice beginning of the conversation. Have you seen these helpful links? Wella Jul 2015 #38
Polygamy is a "lifestyle" and the law isn't required to provide support to every lifestyle. pnwmom Jul 2015 #39
Please listen to yourself. You sound like a RWinger describing gays. Wella Jul 2015 #42
People advocating for polygamists by comparing them to gays are the ones who sound like RWers. pnwmom Jul 2015 #43
Thank you, pnwmom. The ignorance is staggering. kcr Jul 2015 #44
Like these polyamorous activists: Wella Jul 2015 #45
Yes. They are supporting right wing ideology. kcr Jul 2015 #46
What right wing ideology are they supporting? Since when does the right support polyamory? Wella Jul 2015 #47
The right doesn't support polyamory, of course. kcr Jul 2015 #48
The right wing Christian will never support true polygamy, and even the Mormon church has nixed it Wella Jul 2015 #50
And from some libertarians. Yes. Right wingers. kcr Jul 2015 #51
The right wing supports polyamory... WestCoastLib Jul 2015 #52
Why is it so fucking hard to draw the line at INFORMED ADULT CONSENT? backscatter712 Jul 2015 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Plural marriage and its c...»Reply #51