Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
13. It was only practiced by very small cults and was/is not a normative societal value
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 08:19 PM
Jul 2015

just like there are still laws on the books against atheism or spitting on the sidewalks, the date a certain practice is finally banned means nothing.

Your making up a lot of "facts" without substantiation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You may be referring to legal marriage because... WestCoastLib Jul 2015 #1
What utter nonsense. Polygamy was invented for the benefit of powerful men. n/t pnwmom Jul 2015 #2
Polygamy was never invented shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #4
The legal system of polygamy was invented by powerful men. pnwmom Jul 2015 #11
Did the Greek invention of monogamous marriage TexasProgresive Jul 2015 #3
Polygamy was only formally outlawed in 1945 in Japan shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #6
It was only practiced by very small cults and was/is not a normative societal value riderinthestorm Jul 2015 #13
The New Testament has Jesus giving very direct man and wife, no divorce forever guidelines. Bluenorthwest Jul 2015 #14
Rubbish shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #21
He most certainly did. Sorry but it's the text. Bluenorthwest Jul 2015 #23
There were instances in the bible Mojorabbit Jul 2015 #57
There are also references in Chinese literature to second wife, third wife, etc. Warpy Jul 2015 #35
China, Japan, Native American cultures etc - all of whom are older than Greece riderinthestorm Jul 2015 #9
I don't know much about native American societies shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #12
This is historical revisionism and its pretty badly done riderinthestorm Jul 2015 #16
A couple of points shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #19
Not entirely, see above Warpy Jul 2015 #36
Kewl story bro! riderinthestorm Jul 2015 #5
I have never needed a man to "survive" Skittles Jul 2015 #7
Probably because you've never been hungry enough shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #8
Predictable DU. Two people who agree, but who disagree on closeupready Jul 2015 #29
Fair point shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #30
did you miss my last sentence? Skittles Jul 2015 #41
No shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #48
take some reading comprehension classes, PLEASE Skittles Jul 2015 #49
You don't have much in the way of writing skills either shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #56
Going it alone can be very satisfying Warpy Jul 2015 #37
I just don't do all the bullshit people expect from women Skittles Jul 2015 #42
Fine RobinA Jul 2015 #67
Second Wife ... Third Wife? Bad Thoughts Jul 2015 #10
True shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #15
Wow. Bluenorthwest Jul 2015 #17
Socialism would remove hierarchy PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #18
Yes shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #20
Longhouses of the indigenous peoples of North America sgtbenobo Jul 2015 #52
Domestic plural marriages among consenting adults Warpy Jul 2015 #39
Ayn Rand fan aren't you MattBaggins Jul 2015 #50
Wow, this is some seriously delusional nonsense mythology Jul 2015 #22
That is confusing causation with correlation shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #26
Polygamy goes both ways. panader0 Jul 2015 #24
No argument from me shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #27
What woman would be interested in having several husbands? For many of us, it's hard Nay Jul 2015 #59
Anthropologist Marvin Harris: betsuni Jul 2015 #25
I'm a woman and I do not believe monogamy is natural IVoteDFL Jul 2015 #28
Why?? Absolutely destructive to women. Are these men who are fucking around with all the women they Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2015 #32
At one point marriage in itself was destructive to women IVoteDFL Jul 2015 #33
Describe the benefits to women. Are there any? What are the responsibilities of the men? Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2015 #34
Polygamy isn't necessarily one man + several women. IVoteDFL Jul 2015 #65
If society accepted Polyandry, I could see that and perhaps get down with this. But more often than Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2015 #72
Then They Don't RobinA Jul 2015 #69
The problem is with "consent". asturias31 Jul 2015 #53
I stress, not everyone who would enter into a polygamous marriage is religious IVoteDFL Jul 2015 #66
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #70
that's some pretty judgmental, broadbrush stuff there fizzgig Jul 2015 #44
natural is an extremely relative term fizzgig Jul 2015 #47
Polygamy = an excuse for men to be irresponsible and use women as sex objects...and have sex Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2015 #31
Nothing illegal about using women as sex objects shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #38
Who said anything about illegality? I stated that I don't agree that infected dicks infecting women Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2015 #40
I'm not sure that polygamy necessarily involves a greater prevalence of infected dicks shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #45
Since when did not illegal mean the right thing to do? kcr Jul 2015 #43
Its not. I'm not suggesting that you should have a gay marriage shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #46
Yes, but consenting adults is also not the only issue. kcr Jul 2015 #51
Actually - I thought JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #58
Essentially, yes shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #60
Girls don't get a choice in the fundamentalist Mormon community JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #63
In the future I would like no such thing as marriage gwheezie Jul 2015 #54
Will someone please remind me.... sgtbenobo Jul 2015 #55
Pseudo intellectual bullshit. romanic Jul 2015 #61
I knocked it out on my phone in about five minutes shaayecanaan Jul 2015 #62
The ancient Egyptians too, except for the king, were monogamus. bklyncowgirl Jul 2015 #64
show me a country/society where both gender equality and polygamy is legal. La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2015 #68
Monagamy was not invented...marriage was invented... joeybee12 Jul 2015 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Monogamy wasn't invented ...»Reply #13