Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Polymarriage deserves a defense [View all]Skittles
(160,236 posts)37. if the choice is to be married to one man or be one of several wives of one man
I opt for BEING SINGLE
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
239 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why are these polygamy, plural marriage threads popping up everywhere on DU now?
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2015
#1
I can't speak to the "killing women" threads. I've neither seen nor participated in them.
Wella
Jul 2015
#3
So it's not about the facts or the logic: it's about which story you agree with.
Wella
Jul 2015
#103
Of course there haven't been reports; these women are probably being threatened and/or
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2015
#5
Lol! I don't deny there are cults out there. But I know several couples in poly relationships.
Katashi_itto
Jul 2015
#10
How are the women (mis)treated? No one can convince me that somehow these arrangements are
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2015
#14
One man can fuck around on many "wives" and be sexually free? That's not liberating to women at all.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2015
#34
I don't get out much? NO. I just don't agree that men should treat women like sex slaves or
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2015
#47
Well, good for you! I don't give a shit about your relationship. That's a private thing. Keep that
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2015
#82
You mad? I don't agree with women being oppressed and will NEVER support that.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2015
#83
Yep, its the same "I got mine so fuck everyone else." Scratch the surface of a lot of the
Katashi_itto
Jul 2015
#125
Religious-based polygamy, yes. But polyamory, especially among progressives and libertarians? No
Wella
Jul 2015
#11
No. If we legalize it for them then we cannot say shit when the fdls starts more polygamy towns.
bravenak
Jul 2015
#16
True. But it will be OPEN, not hidden, and that tends to reduce the power of abusers
Wella
Jul 2015
#21
Check out this link, the OP has very different language about LGBT equality....
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#151
Of course not. Wella has been very clearly not on the side of marriage equality on several
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#168
Wella has developed a strange affinity for polygamy that I have never seen before.
bravenak
Jul 2015
#170
Actually, it's likely that the risk-mitigation is in the direction of legalization.
Chan790
Jul 2015
#235
Thank you. This refers to traditional religious polygamy and it's done illegally and in secret
Wella
Jul 2015
#31
No it's, not the same. People are born gay. People choose how many other people they want to schtup
underahedgerow
Jul 2015
#181
You continue to use the world 'polyamory' when you mean 'polygamy'. The words are not
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#143
You do know that the OP has suggested that standing with LGBT people is 'standing against God'?
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#155
Hey, you are the one who is not speaking of yourself, that is your choice, I assume because you
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#164
Boudries? This is about self advocacy, it's yours to do, no one else's. You have never brought it up
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#189
TM99 is such a LGBT justice warrior he forgets the Obergefell decision
riderinthestorm
Jul 2015
#194
Considering Wella was banned for running many accounts the term 'RL persona' might not apply
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#223
I address Wella, you answer for him. Wella has now been banned as an operator of multiple accounts.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#232
if the choice is to be married to one man or be one of several wives of one man
Skittles
Jul 2015
#37
Exactly! No thanks. I value my pussy too much to allow some infected dick in there. No thanks, sir!
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2015
#50
And some here feels it is okay to continue the degradation of women by mixing it with polygamy.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2015
#18
Can we stick to the topic, please, and stop with the straw men. We are discussing polygamy/plural
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2015
#28
You suddenly constantly post about polygamy, but you were not a strong advocate for marriage
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#145
Good spot to insert the fact that Wella has been banned for operateing multiple accounts
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#229
"A philosophy that has been typically objectifying, degrading, and damaging to women"
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Jul 2015
#157
Hmmm...you came right out and said it - good. I've come to the same opinion... nt
jonno99
Jul 2015
#188
Polymarriage deserves a defense? Maybe. But that defense is not and will never be
Betty Karlson
Jul 2015
#105
You, madam/ sir, are a homophobe for compairing homosexuality with bigamy.
Betty Karlson
Jul 2015
#122
I'd rather be called a polyphobe than give any credence to the homophobic memes
Betty Karlson
Jul 2015
#126
You are taking away my dignity by implying that my committed relationship
Betty Karlson
Jul 2015
#130
Dig this thread: Wella has a whole different point of view going on...in a thread standing with us
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#159
Let's take a look at a comment from you about same sex marriage from the OP 'A Message to
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#150
That doesn't change the fact that it was wrong for the right wing to suggest
Betty Karlson
Jul 2015
#214
A thread to consider: In a thread titled 'A mesage to the DU LGBT Community' the OP had very
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#158
You should read the entire thread, not just the parts excerpted, get all the context that exists
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#192
No you lazy bastards. You don't get to piggy-back on nigh a century of GLBT progress
whatthehey
Jul 2015
#174
Hi, I'm posting on Saturday the 10th to let you know that the OP you are defending was posted
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#225
Your pal Wella has been PPR'd for running multiple sock accounts and posting under them while
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#222
Well, 'the others' were also wella, several of them. And the rest of you could not tell a faked up
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#228
Actual polyamorous LGBT people would not have done this mean ass crap, that's why a bunch of
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#234