General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Holy Moly! Holder "sees striking a deal" with Snowden to return to USA. This is huge. [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,825 posts)... was your original thread title, which was: "Holder "striking a deal" with Snowden to return to USA."
I asked you to explain how Holder could strike a deal, being as he has no capacity to do so. In fact, I asked you the question four times, and you never answered the direct question. Ergo, I assumed that perhaps you didn't know that Holder was no longer the AG - which would also explain why you didn't notice that your thread title couldn't possibly be correct.
As for insinuating that someone said something they never said, you might want to point me to where I insinuated that you stated something you never said.
I never stated that you said Holder was still AG, did I? I simply asked you, several times, to explain how the title "Holder "striking a deal" with Snowden to return to USA" could possibly be accurate, given Holder's current private citizen status.
It seems that if you knew Holder wasn't in a position to strike any such deal, you would have (a) said so immediately, which would have (b) prompted you to revisit your title and correct it.
Instead, you kept defending your original title as accurate, and offered no explanation as to how it could be so.
Pretty simple stuff.