Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Seattle's "Outside Agitators 206" & why they want to drive a wedge between BLM and Democrats [View all]robertpaulsen
(8,632 posts)44. Interesting comment at that link.
ireadrslashnew [score hidden] 2 hours ago
I would check a more up-to-date databse, it looks like Amazon AWS owns this IP now which would make a lot more sense.
Check it here, and you can see that the database from April shows Merck, but the new database shows Amazon: https://www.iplocation.net/
I would check a more up-to-date databse, it looks like Amazon AWS owns this IP now which would make a lot more sense.
Check it here, and you can see that the database from April shows Merck, but the new database shows Amazon: https://www.iplocation.net/
I'm not tech-savvy enough to verify, but if this poster is correct, Merck did own the IP as recently as April.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/3gi8ii/outside_agitators_206_who_caused_the_seattle/
So what was Merck doing with it then, and why is it now being used by these Outside Agitator trolls?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Seattle's "Outside Agitators 206" & why they want to drive a wedge between BLM and Democrats [View all]
FourScore
Aug 2015
OP
Anarchy indeed -- their leader explained how they work in this earlier performance:
GreatGazoo
Aug 2015
#13
An anarchist group is closer to libertarianism than any other party. Just a matter of degree.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#23
I believe the controlling entity's interest is financial as much as it's ideological.
robertpaulsen
Aug 2015
#34
Except putting the Merck name on it is harder than not putting the Merck name on it.
jeff47
Aug 2015
#62
How could they? Hillary has Secret Service protection and doesn't go to events like this anyway.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#24
Code Pink hasn't gotten into closed fundraisers, and as even you know (and have probably
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#33
Yelling from the back of the room, inaudible, for 15 seconds before being escorted out
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Aug 2015
#36
funny how Bernie's stated goal is virtually identical although not 100% AA focused
tk2kewl
Aug 2015
#16