Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 07:30 AM Oct 2015

"In an interesting twist and a brilliant maneuver, each and every Democrat recused themselves ..." [View all]

Wisconsin Republicans are legalizing corruption as fast as they can. Democrats can only protest in silence.



http://cognidissidence.blogspot.com/2015/10/wisconsin-i-hardly-recognize-you.html


The bill would allow legislative campaign committees and political parties to receive unlimited contributions, with the exception of a $12,000 per year limit on PAC contributions to those committees and parties. The legislation would allow unlimited contributions to be made to and transferred between political action committees. Recall committees and referendum committees could also receive unlimited funds, and unlimited funds could be donated to pay expenses related to a recall or recount. Candidates could also make unlimited personal contributions to their own committee.

The proposal would ban candidates from coordinating with outside groups on express advocacy — calls to vote "for or against" a candidate — but would place no restrictions on coordination on issue advocacy.


In an interesting twist and a brilliant maneuver, each and every Democrat recused themselves from the vote, pointing out that they have a conflict of interest because it would directly affect their own campaign committees. The Republicans were at a loss at having their blatant corruption and greed exposed like that, but not enough so to keep them from passing the bill anyway.

...

To deal with that, the Republicans are also set to dismantle the Government Accountability Board (GAB), a nonpartisan panel of former judges that investigate campaign finance and ethics violations. The Republicans want to replace the GAB with two partisan panels - one for campaign finance violations and one for ethics violations - each consisting of three Republicans and three Democrats. This will leave the committees at stalemates on almost every issue.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will Wisconsin Democrats challenge every single seat in this election cycle? Half-Century Man Oct 2015 #1
We'll soon find out if Martha Laning is a progressive Democrat or just another corporate shill. Scuba Oct 2015 #2
I'm guessing the latter. WI, the state I used to love Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #3
Corporate entities pick their candidates and fund them to win the primary. stillwaiting Oct 2015 #4
For sure the game is rigged. Wisconsin is truly a fascist oligarchy. hue Oct 2015 #6
I don't think its apathy ... Myrina Oct 2015 #9
Many of my co-workers have knowledge of most of the truth but just can't be bothered... hue Oct 2015 #10
Shock Doctrine, state by state. That's the plan. -nt CrispyQ Oct 2015 #13
Those who benefit from Wall St. raouldukelives Oct 2015 #12
DFA has been (somewhat successfully) working on this; everyone should be a member. WFP too, though Chathamization Oct 2015 #17
I think the new WI DEM chair gets it and will work to elect progressives. jonestonesusa Oct 2015 #15
I sure hope so. The last thing we need is for Laning to be another corpo-Dem. Scuba Oct 2015 #16
Truly, how can this be legal? And of course, unions contribute largely through PACs AllyCat Oct 2015 #5
Bucky Badger Is Is Reviewing The Memberships Of All Republicans In The Fan Club! NonMetro Oct 2015 #7
Sounds like Daley's Chicago Machine. nt Nitram Oct 2015 #8
The FBI's Prohibition era mob investigation in Chicago was never closed. ieoeja Oct 2015 #11
Poor Wisconsin. Unknown Beatle Oct 2015 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"In an interesting t...