General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Breaking News: Monsanto to Be Put to Trial in Hague for Crimes Against Humanity [View all]HuckleB
(35,773 posts)His stuff was debunked in one of the pieces I already posted. (And note that his single debunked study does not mean the meta analysis in my post goes away.)
Also, I don't think you read the fourth link. It's quite balanced.
When Bad News Stories Help Bad Science Go Viral
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/collideascape/2012/10/03/when-bad-news-stories-help-bad-science-go-viral/
A Very Short Debunking: Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops on Pesticide Use: The First Thirteen Years Benbrook, 2009
http://www.foodsecurist.com/debunked-impacts-of-genetically-engineered-crops-on-pesticide-use-the-first-thirteen-years-benbrook-2009/
Anti-GMO study is appropriately dismissed as biased, poorly-performed
http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2012/09/24/anti-gmo-study-is-appropriately-dismissed-as-biased-poorly-performed/
And guess who funds Benbrook's bad science?
Washington State Professor Allies With Organics Industry
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/09/06/us/document-benbrook.html?_r=0
This is a classic story that shows the ugly side of corporations. This time, the corporations are ones that have tried to pretend their the good guys, when they're not, but it's no different. It's interesting that this is an OP supposedly focused on bad corporate behavior, but it's supported by NGOs who are supported by corporations who are acting rather badly.