Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The European far right: actually right? Or left? Or something altogether different? [View all]
Marine Le Pens ideology cannot be defined simply as right wing.
The success of the Front National hasnt gone unnoticed in the popular media. In news coverage the FN and other members of the Nativist Populist (NP) party family are most often referred to as far-right. In the economic sense at least, the accuracy of the far-right descriptor is doubtful.
Le Pens own public utterances criticising ultra liberalism and mondialism (One Worldism) are evidence enough that her natural constituency is not the Davos set. Rather, she is distinctly protectionist in her economic positions, having described globalisation as getting slaves to make things abroad to sell to unemployed people here".
French voters who support the Front National feel assailed on two fronts. First by cheap Chinese and other foreign imports local manufacturers cannot compete against, lest they start a race to the bottom. Second, they fear mass non-European immigration, mainly from Islamic Africa and Asia. They perceive themselves to be overwhelmed by free markets and open borders. The NP parties portray a situation where globalising elites make all the gains while the average citizen loses job security, identity and quality of life.
NP economics are nativist in the sense theyre designed to protect the national interest against foreign capitalists in the age of globalisation, while simultaneously supporting intra-national homogeneity by restricting welfare.
Welfare for all, as long as they are us
The nativists transcend the traditional right-left dichotomy of party politics by supporting the welfare state (albeit restricted to natives), while developing economic policies designed to protect native business, workers and culture from the perceived excesses of global free trade and Islamism.
The economics of the NPs are defensive. They support welfare and state led solutions to economic problems, and often support renationalisation of key state assets.
Beyond the left/right dichotomy
Dutch political scientist Cas Mudde has developed the most considered and precise understanding of the NP party family, concluding their defining features are nativism, populism and authoritarianism.
Considering the economic positions of the party family in Europe, the far right descriptor is inaccurate. In the current context such parties would be better referred as nationalist, ethno-communitarian, or populist to better express their positions which are a combination of what is a combination of traditionalist patriotic, conservatism and statist, protectionist, mixed economics.
For the FN its not a struggle between left and right, but between nationalism and internationalism in its left, right, corporate and Islamic guises.
http://theconversation.edu.au/the-european-far-right-actually-right-or-left-or-something-altogether-different-6796
An interesting look at the "far-right" parties in Europe. The author, who is Australian, has come up with the term "Nativist Populist (NP)" to describe these parties in order to get away from the left-right way of looking at them. I'm not sure how the terms are used in Australia, but "nativist" and "populist" can be loaded terms in the US. I wonder if the author meant to use them that way or if she was looking for more neutral (and accurate, given their definitions) terms than "far-right" to describe some European parties.
The author was just looking at the political situation in Europe, not the US, but would the tea party here qualify as a 'nativist populist' party?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 3111 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The European far right: actually right? Or left? Or something altogether different? [View all]
pampango
May 2012
OP
LOL. Right is *really* Left, guys! Plus, sticking up for worker is totally racist!
Romulox
May 2012
#1
Le Pen is the head of an openly racist party. The OP is attempting to link pro-worker sentiment
Romulox
May 2012
#4
OK, but as you can see, the OP isn't the type to discuss this sort of nuance. The insinuation of a
Romulox
May 2012
#6
I think that is the point of the article. The Euroright is, at least in economic terms, different
pampango
May 2012
#12
That's funny, since *you* (not the author) highlighted all the stuff about economics in big letters.
Romulox
May 2012
#13
I did all the highlighting whether it was about economics, immigration, welfare, nationalism vs.
pampango
May 2012
#14
I've had to explain this to people before, European 'right' is NOT at all American neo-con 'right',
cecilfirefox
May 2012
#8