General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Yes, the CIA Director Was Part of the JFK Assassination Cover-Up [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)...and the role of CIA and the Mafia in killing Castro and Friends. That's where the banal goes pultroon: In the name of preventing nuclear war, Justice Warren failed to learn all there was to know. Since then, the HSCA -- House Select Committee on Assassinations -- got two staffers over to the CIA and started looking over the files. Then, one day, the investigators asked about Johnny Roselli and got a little too close. So, CIA recalled their liaison and appointed George Joannides. How was Congress to know Joannides wasn't just a liaison, but a participant in the FBI-CIA program monitoring Oswald in the summer of 1963?
The author is an eyewitness, serving as a staff member of the House Select Committee on Assassination in the mid-1970s. Today an attorney, Hardway has gone on-record to detail how CIA went out of its way to obstruct Congress:
A CRUEL AND SHOCKING MISINTERPRETATION
by Dan Hardway, (c) 2015
EXCERPT...
To fully appreciate why I say that, a little background from Washington in 1978, is necessary. In 1978 the CIA resisted the HSCAs inquiry into Mexico City more than any other area of inquiry. The chief counsel, G. Robert Blakey, told the Committee on August 15, 1978, (T)he deeper we have gotten into the Agencys performance in Mexico City, the more difficult they have gotten in dealing with us, the more they have insisted on relevance, the more they have gone back in effect on their agreement to give us access to unsanitized files. For a while we had general and free access to unsanitized files. That is increasingly not true in the Mexico City area . And we have since learned that they used George Joannides to shut down the investigation into Oswald and Mexico City. In doing so, they lied to us about who he was. He ran propaganda operations in
Miami in 1963-64 and was the case officer for DRE, the anti-Castro group that scored the anti-Fair Play for Cuba Committee coup using Oswald in New Orleans in August of 1963. As G. Robert Blakey has since acknowledged, The CIA not only lied, it actively subverted the investigation. I think the CIA expected we would take the superficial approach of considering the Castro did it theory, but when we went beyond the initial appearances and began pushing our investigation into the propaganda sources, seeking interviews with the actual penetration and surveillance agents, seeking to find others in Mexico City who may have seen Oswald, then the Agency resistance to our investigation turned to a stonewall. Shouldnt it be enough to raise serious questions that when a Congressional Committee investigating specific disinformation operations ran by the CIA, the CIA brings one of those involved in the operation being investigated and uses him in an undercover capacity to forestall and subvert the investigation? But thats not all.
Consider the scenario of U.S. intelligence involvement in Oswalds activities in Mexico City that we were not able to fully investigate in 1978. Lets start with some background on David Phillips. David Phillips was one of, if not the, most experienced, ingenious, respected, and qualified disinformation officers in the CIA. In 1963 he was stationed in Mexico City, but, in early October, he was temporarily assigned to duty at Headquarters because he was being promoted from running anti-Castro propaganda operations to overseeing all anti-Castro operations in the Western Hemisphere. He was an experienced hand. In the late 1950s he had been under non-diplomatic cover in Havana, where he worked with student leaders who would eventually form the Directorio Revolucionario Estudantil (DRE). During the Bay of Pigs, Phillips was stationed at CIA Headquarters where he had responsibility for the propaganda and psychological warfare aspects of the antiCastro operations. In running those operations he not only oversaw the operations he ran personally from Headquarters, he was also the supervisor of the propaganda operations flowing out of the JMWAVE station in Miami by William Kent (aka Doug Gupton, William Trouchard). When the students who had been recruited by Phillips fled Cuba, they were reorganized under Kents tutelage into the DRE based in Miami.
Phillips was transferred to Mexico City later in 1961 after the Bay of Pigs. Kent was promoted to Headquarters, and George Joannides took over Kents position in Miami, including supervision of DRE. While still stationed in Headquarters in the early 60s, David Phillips had worked with Cord Meyer to develop the first disinformation campaign aimed at discrediting and disrupting a group of Castro sympathizers who had organized themselves into the Fair Play for Cuba Committee (FPCC). In the summer of 1963 Lee Harvey Oswald formed a chapter of the FPCC in New Orleans. In August of 1963 Lee Harvey Oswald, still in New Orleans, had an encounter with DRE which led to a lot of publicity linking Oswald to communists, labeling him as pro-Castro, and discrediting the FPCC. In July and August of that year there is strong evidence that Oswald was used to identify and contact pro-Castro students at Tulane University. In early September, Oswald was seen with David Philips in Dallas.
On September 16, 1963, the CIA informed the FBI that it was considering action to counter the activities of the FPCC in foreign countries. To my knowledge, the operational files on this new anti-FPCC operation have never been released by the CIA. In New Orleans, on September 17, 1963, Oswald applied for, and received, a Mexican travel visa immediately after William Gaudet, a known CIA agent, had applied for one. On September 27 Oswald arrived in Mexico City. This activity did not occur suddenly or in a vacuum. Oswald had started establishing his pro-Castro bona fides earlier that summer in New Orleans, including establishing an FPCC chapter there.
CONTINUED...
http://aarclibrary.org/a-cruel-and-shocking-misinterpretation/
The evidence revealed since 1964 shows that whoever was behind the assassination didn't really matter as much as their objective: Link Oswald to Cuba and let blame fall on Castro. That way, somebody could have their nuclear war on the the commies and smash the USSR once and for all and be happy. Now that's evil.