Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So McConnell will amend constitution to limit President to court picks ONLY in first 3yrs of term? [View all]Initech
(100,068 posts)29. All this is, is the Republicans saying "fuck you" to Obama, nothing more.
McConnell talks a lot of shit about undermining Obama but when the time comes to actually do something, he'll run and hide with his tail between his legs.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So McConnell will amend constitution to limit President to court picks ONLY in first 3yrs of term? [View all]
blm
Mar 2016
OP
And this will go the way of the other thousands of proposed amendments
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2016
#1
Turtle man is a fool. By not confirming this moderate judge, he's leaving the door open
Vinca
Mar 2016
#2
I hope Dems demand Mitch go through legislative process to change the constitution to reflect
blm
Mar 2016
#3
I hope he remembers the part requiring judges to only *die* during the first 3 years of POTUS terms.
Gidney N Cloyd
Mar 2016
#4
LOL - Would love to hear the senate debate McConnell's 'principled' change to the constitution.
blm
Mar 2016
#5
Quite some years ago I served as president of a professional association . . . . .
Stinky The Clown
Mar 2016
#6
Dems have to frame McConnell's 'principle' this way: Then vote to amend the constitution to declare
blm
Mar 2016
#7
There hasn't been a Constitution since George Bush was selected to be President
lunatica
Mar 2016
#12
I'm referring to Mitch's CLAIM of it being a 'principled' position that president should not
blm
Mar 2016
#21
By his logic, any appointment should only happen in odd-numbered years
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2016
#23
No need to amend the Constitution, it already doesn't make the Senate consent to a President's...
PoliticAverse
Mar 2016
#26
Polls already show the majority of the American people want the senate to hold hearings...
PoliticAverse
Mar 2016
#34
the Republicans ran the 22nd amendment for term limits through because they hated FDR.
hobbit709
Mar 2016
#28