General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Amnesty! Thank you Skinner. [View all]tencats
(567 posts)On Thu Mar 17, 2016, 03:58 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
I've always known Sanders was a corrupt con man. eom
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1517308
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
C'mon-- really? "A corrupt con man"?
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Mar 17, 2016, 04:02 PM, and the Jury voted 6-1 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Ridiculous. Did you read Skinners letter? HIDE.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I may support Clinton, but I truly respect and would be more than thrilled to support Sanders should he find a way to prevail and win the nomination. For DUers to paint the opposing Dem candidates as some have in this primary period leaves me with a bitter taste in my mouth. I for one will vote to hide this ugliness directed at EITHER Dem candidate.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Yes it is certainly "disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate." No need for this kind of insulting remark here.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: People might not agree with everything Sanders supports, but he receives 25 percent of the Republican vote when he runs in Vermont because of his honesty and integrity. This is well known, so I am sure this poster seeks simply to defame.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.