Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Effort in South Dakota Aims to Drop Parties [View all]
Effort in South Dakota Aims to Drop Parties
By KRISTINA PETERSON - March 28, 2016 7:57 p.m. ET
Voters to consider initiative to largely end party labels on ballots, set up open primaries
SIOUX FALLS, S.D.In South Dakota, where the shadow of Mount Rushmores presidents looms large, political parties could become nearly invisible on ballots.
The antiestablishment anger helping to propel the presidential campaigns of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders across the country is taking a different twist here: fueling support among disenchanted voters for a ballot initiative with the lofty goal of getting rid of both political partiesas much as possible, at least.
When South Dakotans turn up at the polls in November, they will be asked to decide whether to eliminate party labels next to most candidates names on future ballots. The amendment to the state constitution would also establish open primary elections, with the top two vote-getters from any party advancing to the general election in most races.
The proposal is controversial among the states politically connected, but has resonated with some voters tired of partisan bickering. South Dakotans already vote for many local city and school officials without party labels, and some are ready to extend that practice well up the ticket. The ballot initiative would remove affiliations for all federal, state and county elected offices, but not presidential candidates.
It would make people look for something different: what does [the candidate] believe in? said Sioux Falls resident Regie Poppenga, a Democrat who supports Mr. Trump for president. The two political parties havent been serving our purpose, said Mr. Poppenga, a paint contractor. Thats why Trump and Sanders are doing so good....
Read more:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/effort-in-south-dakota-aims-to-drop-parties-1459209463
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
20 replies, 2308 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (29)
ReplyReply to this post
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Works well in California, though it does not apply to Presidential elections.
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2016
#1
^People don't understand how things work in their own states, and playing it out will help expose
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#11
SC has already ruled what SD is doing violates a party's freedom of association
still_one
Apr 2016
#2
At least that is how I read it. If this passes in SD, it will be interest if they try to get it to
still_one
Apr 2016
#6
Arkansas has non-partisan judicial elections. You have no idea if the person is a R or a D.
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#12