GMOs are bad for biodiversity, bad for non-corporate farming, bad for the public's right to natural

[Major Nikon]

36. Good question

Who is funding all the bullshit misinformation?

You do realize the vast majority of anti-GMO stuff on this site comes from sources that also promote anti-vax, chemtrails, homeopathy, fluoridation conspiracies, AIDS denial, and all sorts of other forms of the nuttiest crankery imaginable, yes?

Some of the darlings of your so-called "pro-consumer-choice movement" are Globalresearch, Naturalnews, Seralini, Vani Hari, OCA, Mercola, and several others many of which are making millions from the organic industry at best or selling outright snake oil. So it just isn't that hard to follow the money which goes far behind "Hippies at the farmers market".

So what does it mean when someone pulls the predictable and overused to the point of cliche Shill Gambit® card when someone dares to call bullshit on obvious bullshit? Do you think that actually strengthens their position or weakens it?