Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'You're not fooling anybody': Eichenwald challenges Tucker Carlson with a binder full of ... [View all]ZoomBubba
(289 posts)41. So, where has the Democratic Party ...
... taken an official stance against GMOs?
I'll already tell you that they haven't. They're not going to stand against the science that has shown that GMOs are safe. The Democratic party does not have a stance against nuclear power, which is green, and they still officially all renewable energy by 2050, but still support oil exploration.
Hillary also favored increasing research and investment into nuclear energy:
Hillary Clinton (D): Meeting the climate challenge is too important to limit the tools available in this fight. Nuclear powerwhich accounts for more than 60 percent of our zero carbon power generation todayis one of those tools. I will work to ensure that the climate benefits of our existing nuclear power plants that are safe to operate are appropriately valued and increase investment in the research, development and deployment of advanced nuclear power. At the same time, we must continue to invest in the security of our nuclear materials at home, and improve coordination between federal, state, and local authorities. We must also seek to reduce the amount of nuclear material worldwideworking with other countries so minimize the use of weapons-grade material for civil nuclear programs.
You're assuming you speak for Democrats when the platform doesn't have such a position. You are projecting your own opinions.
The rest of what you said doesn't not contradict anything I said.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'You're not fooling anybody': Eichenwald challenges Tucker Carlson with a binder full of ... [View all]
DonViejo
Dec 2016
OP
The poster was pretty explicit and to the point. Hundreds of posts in the first week does raise...
Hekate
Dec 2016
#15
Long-term posters have noticed substantial attempts to defray and silence the dialogue here.
byronius
Dec 2016
#37
You're the one who called DU 'ultra-partisan'. I don't agree. And I didn't 'rip your throat out'.
byronius
Dec 2016
#95
I don't take political disagreement for "disingenuous infiltration", for the most part, Perse.
Mc Mike
Dec 2016
#75
The Journalist has been attacked with lights to trigger seizures & his family is terrified. No time
Sunlei
Dec 2016
#50
BS your're trying to stifle free press in America. Do you know who threatens his kids & family?
Sunlei
Dec 2016
#57
DU is full of paranoids who see right wingers hiding under every other paragraph
eniwetok
Dec 2016
#80
But that's an acceptable speculation for FOX news to make against HRC. The point is.......
W T F
Dec 2016
#34
fox lies and fox is an arm of the Republican party. The Party that destroys American democracy.
Sunlei
Dec 2016
#20
right here, all will be uploaded, twitters free. https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald
Sunlei
Dec 2016
#52
I had no idea that these criminal acts were occurring against Mr. E and his family.
Mc Mike
Dec 2016
#73
Republicans don't want the world to know their man is ill for decades and has a medication problem.
Sunlei
Dec 2016
#38
He has his medical records from those decades, before the trump tower live-in Doctor.
Sunlei
Dec 2016
#51
I like most of your journal entries, eni. Except your $15 minimum wage opposition.
Mc Mike
Dec 2016
#87