Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

treestar

(82,383 posts)
8. "Fun" yes they are not taking it seriously
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 10:44 AM
Dec 2016

It is entertainment. The way the media covers the election is for entertainment. Notice they argue with their interviewees. They don't ask them for facts. The don't report any but the shallowest facts.

You can probably go on CSPAN or somewhere for real policy discussions. But that is not as entertaining.

You get these people who become personalities. Even we do it - we have Keith and Rachel. All this "analysis" is really for entertainment. They know they would lose ratings if they simply reported on what a bill contained and who was voting what way on it.

Instead of the arguing and analyzing, they could use the time to report further on other bills say, that are never reported about. People complain that Washington is being corrupt or lazy, but they do have something to do with it, choosing entertainment over really finding out what is going on there.

I'll admit blue cat Dec 2016 #1
well... djsunyc Dec 2016 #2
It is food for thought treestar Dec 2016 #3
I thought it was name recognition as well, but... Txbluedog Dec 2016 #5
Something shifted between 1976 and 1980 no_hypocrisy Dec 2016 #4
I agree Txbluedog Dec 2016 #7
"Fun" yes they are not taking it seriously treestar Dec 2016 #8
Name ID only goes so far crazycatlady Dec 2016 #6
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The age of the celebrity ...»Reply #8